2008
DOI: 10.1086/526759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“A Politie of Civill & Military Power”: Political Thought and the Late Seventeenth-Century Foundations of the East India Company-State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some, the European merchant powers should be seen merely as the forerunner of modern multinational corporations (Stern, 2009: 1151); for others, they represent a ‘quasi sovereign’ (Clulow, 2009: 72), or ‘hybrid’ form of polity which combines the functions of governance with the profit-seeking motivations of a private corporation (Philips, 2017: 40). While some historians have even argued that these merchant companies should be seen as a distinct form of polity in their own right as a ‘company state’ (Stern, 2008; Weststeijn, 2014). Although the VOC was sometimes backed by the state, it also developed as a separate commercial organisation with civic autonomy, which reflected the competing interests of different business factions.…”
Section: The Voc As a Merchant Empirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some, the European merchant powers should be seen merely as the forerunner of modern multinational corporations (Stern, 2009: 1151); for others, they represent a ‘quasi sovereign’ (Clulow, 2009: 72), or ‘hybrid’ form of polity which combines the functions of governance with the profit-seeking motivations of a private corporation (Philips, 2017: 40). While some historians have even argued that these merchant companies should be seen as a distinct form of polity in their own right as a ‘company state’ (Stern, 2008; Weststeijn, 2014). Although the VOC was sometimes backed by the state, it also developed as a separate commercial organisation with civic autonomy, which reflected the competing interests of different business factions.…”
Section: The Voc As a Merchant Empirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The political establishment in Britain, however, increasingly took the view that there was an appropriate division of labor between states and companies, and that the use of organized violence was properly the sole province of the former. 131 As such, the EIC's hybrid status came under attack inside and outside Parliament; for the first time, the Company's doings in Asia came under widespread popular and media scrutiny. Edmund Burke and Adam Smith were only two of the best known critics of the Company, assailing the combination of powers best kept separate.…”
Section: The Historical Evolution Of Gunboat Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the experience of Lichfield contradicts the established picture of the Royalist war effort, in which regularized and well‐managed taxation gradually descended into plunder by an increasingly ‘feral’ soldier‐gentry. Perhaps the most interesting contribution to ‘high’ political history is Stern's discussion of the East India ‘Company‐State’. Prevailing historiography has seen the late seventeenth‐century company not as the body politic it was to become after 1757 but as a mere ‘colonial frontier’ of the national state.…”
Section: (Iii) 1500–1700
Jonathan Healey
University Of Cambridgementioning
confidence: 99%