2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jda.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A polynomial algorithm to find an independent set of maximum weight in a fork-free graph

Abstract: The class of fork-free graphs is an extension of claw-free graphs and their subclass of line graphs. The first polynomial-time solution to the maximum weight independent set problem in the class of line graphs, which is equivalent to the maximum matching problem in general graphs, has been proposed by Edmonds in 1965 and then extended to the entire class of claw-free graphs by Minty in 1980. Recently, Alekseev proposed a solution for the larger class of fork-free graphs, but only for the unweighted version of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
87
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now assume g is adjacent to one of v 2 , v p , say to v p , and again denote the third neighbor of g by v j . If j ∈ {p − 2, p − 1}, then we obtain conguration (5) or (6). If j ∈ {2, 3}, then we obtain conguration (7) or (8) Lemma 3.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now assume g is adjacent to one of v 2 , v p , say to v p , and again denote the third neighbor of g by v j . If j ∈ {p − 2, p − 1}, then we obtain conguration (5) or (6). If j ∈ {2, 3}, then we obtain conguration (7) or (8) Lemma 3.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this condition is sucient for polynomial-time solvability of the problem is a big open question. Without the restriction on vertex degree, polynomial-time solvability of the problem in classes of S i,j,k -free graphs was shown only for very small values of i, j, k. In particular, the problem can be solved for S 1,1,1 -free (claw-free) graphs [11], S 1,1,2 -free (fork-free) graphs [5], and S 0,1,1 +S 0,1,1 -free (2P 3 -free) graphs [7]. The complexity of the problem in S 0,2,2 -free (P 5 -free) graphs remains an open problem in spite of the multiple partial results on this topic (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, by Lemma 3, a maximum independent set of P 3 (G) corresponds to a CD solution for G. Since maximum independent set problem can be solved in polynomial time in claw-free graphs [12], CD can be solved in polynomial time in (kite, house, xbanner,diamond)-free graphs.…”
Section: Is a CD Solution For G If And Only If Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are several graph transformation, among them the widely used line graph [12]. A graph H is a line graph of a graph G if the vertices of H are in a one-to-one correspondence with the edges of G, with two vertices being adjacent in H if and only if the corresponding edges of G have a vertex in common.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was applied frequently for the solution of N P-hard problems on special graph classes, e.g. by Lozin and Milanič (2008) for the solution of the maximum weight independent set on fork-free graphs.…”
Section: Modular Decomposition and Clique Separatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%