1997
DOI: 10.1006/aima.1997.1673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Polynomial Counterexample to the Markus–Yamabe Conjecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
69
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the Markus-Yamabe conjecture does not hold in dimensions greater than 2 [21], global stability does not follow automatically from local stability, and requires independent proof.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Markus-Yamabe conjecture does not hold in dimensions greater than 2 [21], global stability does not follow automatically from local stability, and requires independent proof.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions I and II are also known as Markus-Yamabe type conditions because they are similar to the condition σ(DF (x)) ⊂ {z ∈ C : Re(z) < 0} proposed for ordinary differential equations, see [3,11] and the references therein. In [4] it is proved that condition I implies GAS for planar polynomial maps and that there are planar rational maps satisfying it having other periodic points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nevertheless, assuming also these additional conditions it turns out that it is possible to obtain dynamical systems for which the origin is not GAS, see [2]. In [3,6] there are examples of polynomial maps defined in R n , n ≥ 3, satisfying the condition and having unbounded orbits. On the other hand, in [4] it is proved that, when F is polynomial, condition II implies GAS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent result, which is the object of this paper, proves the global invertibility of jacobian maps of the form Φ(x, y) = (x + p(x, y), y + q(x, y)), p(x, y) and q(x, y) without terms of degree 1, under the additional assumptions that = 0. In higher dimensions, a striking result states that, in order to prove the n-dimensional Jacobian conjecture, it is sufficient to prove it for maps of the form Φ = L + C, L linear, C cubic, [1], or even for maps of the form Φ(X) = X + (AX) 3 , where A is a nilpotent matrix [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks also to such a new approach, such a question was positively settled in dimension 2 in [5], [6], [7]. In higher dimensions it is known to be false [3], unless some additional hypotheses hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%