2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2017.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A polynomial-time algorithm for Outerplanar Diameter Improvement

Abstract: The Outerplanar Diameter Improvement problem asks, given a graph G and an integer D, whether it is possible to add edges to G in a way that the resulting graph is outerplanar and has diameter at most D. We provide a dynamic programming algorithm that solves this problem in polynomial time. Outerplanar Diameter Improvement demonstrates several structural analogues to the celebrated and challenging Planar Diameter Improvement problem, where the resulting graph should, instead, be planar. The complexity status of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically it is NP-hard to decide whether a geometric graph can be augmented to a cubic geometric graph [13] and also whether an abstract planar graph can be augmented to a cubic planar graph (not preserving any fixed embedding) [8]. Besides the problems mentioned in that survey, decreasing the diameter [6] and the continuous setting (where every point along the edges of an embedded graph is considered as a vertex) received considerable attention [4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically it is NP-hard to decide whether a geometric graph can be augmented to a cubic geometric graph [13] and also whether an abstract planar graph can be augmented to a cubic planar graph (not preserving any fixed embedding) [8]. Besides the problems mentioned in that survey, decreasing the diameter [6] and the continuous setting (where every point along the edges of an embedded graph is considered as a vertex) received considerable attention [4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%