2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A population-based analysis of endovascular aortic stent graft therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies ( 4 ), patients with decreased liver function experienced significantly higher follow-up mortality than those without. The result remained the same in all subgroups considered and after careful statistical adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous studies ( 4 ), patients with decreased liver function experienced significantly higher follow-up mortality than those without. The result remained the same in all subgroups considered and after careful statistical adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Few studies have addressed the effect of poor liver function on outcomes in TBAD patients undergoing endovascular treatment. Some researchers supported endovascular treatment for patients with poor liver function ( 4 , 6 ), whereas others argued against this approach due to the risk of fatal coagulation disorder ( 5 , 15 ). Temporary coagulopathy could develop after TEVAR ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 17 ] A considerable number of published articles have used NHIRD data. [ 11 , 18 , 19 ] Disease diagnoses are based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Ethics Review Committee evaluated and approved this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 5 ] Although long-term outcomes remain unclear compared with open repair in the general population, multiple randomized controlled trials have reported that EVAR and TEVAR were associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality rates [ 6 8 ] ; accordingly, patients with complex comorbidities who are considered to be at “high risk” for open surgery could benefit from EVAR and TEVAR. [ 9 – 11 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%