2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:anor.0000039524.09792.c9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Population-Based Approach to the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Solution representation: since delays in sections 4.1 and 4.2 are done according to the order in which activities appear in the PL, we employ the topological order (TO) representation first proposed by Valls et al (2003Valls et al ( , 2004, and used for the RCPSP by Debels et al (2006). The TO representation ensures a precedence feasible ordering of activities and is updated based on actual finish times after the improvement methods discussed in sections 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 have been applied.…”
Section: Metaheuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution representation: since delays in sections 4.1 and 4.2 are done according to the order in which activities appear in the PL, we employ the topological order (TO) representation first proposed by Valls et al (2003Valls et al ( , 2004, and used for the RCPSP by Debels et al (2006). The TO representation ensures a precedence feasible ordering of activities and is updated based on actual finish times after the improvement methods discussed in sections 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 have been applied.…”
Section: Metaheuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EA (Hartmann 1998;Valls et al 2001Valls et al , 2008, TS (Thomas et al 1998;Tsai et al 1998;Verhoeven 1998), SA (Bouleimen et al 2003;Das et al 2011) are well explored and widely applied to solve MS-RCPSP. It is worth a mention that ACO is not the only swarm intelligence metaheuristic used in solving (MS-) RCPSP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This representation consists of the starting times of the sub-activities with a positive duration in increasing order followed by set of remaining activity modes that are not part of the feasible schedule (i.e. the sub-activities with a duration of zero) and is an extension of the topological order representation of Valls et al (2003Valls et al ( , 2004. Since a feasible project schedule can be uniquely defined by its activity starting times, such an AL can always be constructed.…”
Section: Rcpsp Scheduling Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%