2017
DOI: 10.17352/2455-5479.000029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Population-Based Study Comparing Child (0-4) and Adult (55-74) Mortality, GDP-Expenditure-on- Health and Relative Poverty in the UK and Developed Countries 1989-2014. Some Challenging Outcomes

Abstract: Important Results: Highest average 1980-2014 %GDPEH is USA 12.6%, the lowest UK 7.0%. European average 8.5% a UK to European odds ratio 1:1.21.Widest Income Inequality was USA 15.9 times, UK 13.8 was third, European average 8.5times.Child Mortality fell in every country but eleven signifi cantly better than Britain. Highest was USA 1383pm the UK fourth at 967pm. European average 728pm yielded a European to UK odds ratio of 1:1.33.Income Inequality and CRM signifi cantly correlated (RHO=+0.6188 p<0.001) and low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One surprising finding was that only 54% of total U.S. health expenditure came from “Private” sources, which highlights the considerable funds coming from federal and state provision, yet as the U.S. system is still based on an insurance model, there remains the problem of limited or underinsured people not having their health needs met. 1,6,11,1618,24,25 Indeed, it has long been known that American health is more expensive in part because of over-prescription, overuse of high-tech measures, and higher administrative costs—in effect, “spending more and getting less.” 6,911,3034 Although it has been recognized that the not-for-profit systems are less costly, 33 it is still being argued that the Obama Reform was “no cure for what ails us”; 35 although this is possibly complicated by interactive socioeconomic factors, 1418,2427 it is predominately because health care is delivered via an insurance system that needs to make a profit. 7,32,33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One surprising finding was that only 54% of total U.S. health expenditure came from “Private” sources, which highlights the considerable funds coming from federal and state provision, yet as the U.S. system is still based on an insurance model, there remains the problem of limited or underinsured people not having their health needs met. 1,6,11,1618,24,25 Indeed, it has long been known that American health is more expensive in part because of over-prescription, overuse of high-tech measures, and higher administrative costs—in effect, “spending more and getting less.” 6,911,3034 Although it has been recognized that the not-for-profit systems are less costly, 33 it is still being argued that the Obama Reform was “no cure for what ails us”; 35 although this is possibly complicated by interactive socioeconomic factors, 1418,2427 it is predominately because health care is delivered via an insurance system that needs to make a profit. 7,32,33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is readily acknowledged that a complex range of interactive, multiple causes influence national mortality rates, [15][16][17] but relative poverty is especially linked to child mortality, although the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. [15][16][17][24][25][26][27] Lifestyles and what might be described as the local "geography" of American states are other factors. [27][28][29] However, placing these results within the context of each nation's fiscal investment to health poses the question of comparative effectiveness of the different countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations