2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03709.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A population genomic analysis of species boundaries: neutral processes, adaptive divergence and introgression between two hybridizing plant species

Abstract: Little is known about the nature of species boundaries between closely related plant species and about the extent of introgression as a consequence of hybridization upon secondary contact. To address these topics we analyzed genome-wide differentiation between two closely related Silene species, Silene latifolia and S. dioica, and assessed the strength of introgression in sympatry. More than 300 AFLP markers were genotyped in three allopatric and three sympatric populations of each species. Outlier analyses we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
123
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
123
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FIR013 provides such a marker and our examination of the relative allelic frequencies at the FIR013 locus in parapatric Q. rubra/ Q. ellipsoidalis populations has shown that introgression of the 141 bp allele is consistently higher into the drought tolerant Q. ellipsoidalis than introgression of the 138 bp allele into the mesophilic species, Q. rubra (Table 2, Figure 4; [7]). This pattern of asymmetric introgression of outlier alleles suggests different strength of selection against the 138 bp and 141 bp alleles in non-parental environments if interspecific gene flow is symmetric [41][42][43] as observed in the present study between Q. rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis. In contrast, in the only sympatric population, introgression of the 141 bp into Q. ellipsoidalis is much lower (5%) than introgression of the 138 bp into Q. rubra (19%), suggesting that competition between species might affect introgression at FIR013 outlier alleles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…FIR013 provides such a marker and our examination of the relative allelic frequencies at the FIR013 locus in parapatric Q. rubra/ Q. ellipsoidalis populations has shown that introgression of the 141 bp allele is consistently higher into the drought tolerant Q. ellipsoidalis than introgression of the 138 bp allele into the mesophilic species, Q. rubra (Table 2, Figure 4; [7]). This pattern of asymmetric introgression of outlier alleles suggests different strength of selection against the 138 bp and 141 bp alleles in non-parental environments if interspecific gene flow is symmetric [41][42][43] as observed in the present study between Q. rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis. In contrast, in the only sympatric population, introgression of the 141 bp into Q. ellipsoidalis is much lower (5%) than introgression of the 138 bp into Q. rubra (19%), suggesting that competition between species might affect introgression at FIR013 outlier alleles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This approach has recently been developed in several model plant species demonstrating the role of hybridization and adaptive introgression in the evolution of irises (Iris; Arnold et al 2004), ecological divergence of sunflowers (Helianthus; Rieseberg et al 2007), and the signatures of divergent and balancing selection in campions (Silene; Minder and Widmer 2008) and poplar (Populus; Lexer et al 2010). So far, a few genes involved in adaptation or speciation have been identified in plants including hybrid sterility loci (Lexer and Widmer 2008), determinants of flower color-linked pollinator shifts (Hoballah et al 2007), and genes involved in hybrid necrosis (Bomblies and Weigel 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data so far collected cannot distinguish whether the difference is due to the predicted reduction in Y N e , or to some process increasing high species-wide diversity for X-linked genes. Possibilities include a higher X than Y mutation rate (although this is the opposite of the expectation for any difference between the mutation rates of the two chromosomes, and the data so far available support that expectation, see Filatov & Charlesworth 2002;Filatov 2005), sexual selection causing a high variance in male reproductive success (Laporte & Charlesworth 2002) or introgression of sequences from another species; hybridization is well known to occur between S. latifolia and S. dioica (Baker 1948;Minder & Widmer 2007) and seems to have led to sequences within each species having recombined into X-linked genes of the other (Atanassov et al 2001;Laporte et al 2005). Population size changes also affect the relative diversity levels of genome regions with different N e (Fay & Wu 1999;Pool & Nielsen 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%