2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pore-structure dependent kinetic adsorption model for consideration in char conversion – Adsorption kinetics of CO2 on biomass chars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This differentiation is a major advantage of the NLDFT method, as it allows for the consideration of different pore regimes in mass transfer models. 6,8 On the basis of the low values found for the meso-to macropore regime, one might assume that no mesopores are present. However, CO 2 is not suitable for the analysis of meso-or macropores, since pore filling mainly takes place in smaller pores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This differentiation is a major advantage of the NLDFT method, as it allows for the consideration of different pore regimes in mass transfer models. 6,8 On the basis of the low values found for the meso-to macropore regime, one might assume that no mesopores are present. However, CO 2 is not suitable for the analysis of meso-or macropores, since pore filling mainly takes place in smaller pores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During pyrolysis, gasification, and oxidation of solid fuels, the porous structure of the fuel changes. Besides fuel-specific factors, this effect depends on process temperature, gas atmosphere, and heating rate. To understand and model ongoing conversion subprocesses, such as intraparticle mass transfer or devolatilization, detailed knowledge on the pore structure of the char is inevitable. Because the pore surface in micro-, meso-, and macropores can develop independently, information about the development of the different pore regimes is desirable. Especially for biomass fuels, which generally have higher volatile contents than coal, significant changes in the pore structure can occur during conversion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…m 01 and V 01 are mass and volume, respectively, of the additionally lifted parts when switching from ZP to MP1: the sample (s), the sample container (c), the lifting rod (lr), and the lifting cage (lc). The volume of the sample V s was determined by helium buoyancy measurements at pressures from (1 to 5) MPa and a temperature of 348 K, for which the detailed procedure is described elsewhere [21]. The temperature of 348 K was chosen to minimize the possible adsorption of helium on the sample [22].…”
Section: Gravimetric Sorption System and Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Eq. (13), the position remains constant in MP1 during the kinetic measurements and W 0,eq is only recorded at the equilibrium state [21]. By rearranging the time-dependent mass balance in Eqs.…”
Section: Adsorption Data Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation