2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36456-0_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Portable Natural Language Interface for Diverse Databases Using Ontologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dictionaries used by existing NLIDBs are created manually or semi-automatically [2]. We suggest automatic generation of the domain dictionary from a synonym dictionary and the database metadata with the help of some linguistic processing.…”
Section: Generation Of the Domain Dictionarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dictionaries used by existing NLIDBs are created manually or semi-automatically [2]. We suggest automatic generation of the domain dictionary from a synonym dictionary and the database metadata with the help of some linguistic processing.…”
Section: Generation Of the Domain Dictionarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost-benefit analysis gives insight into the implications of implementing the recommendations of a software quality model in the context of a dynamic development process [3]. Logistic regression in conjunction with a specialized mathematical model, which we have been proposed, predicted whether each module was fault-prone or not [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The customization methodology proposed for an NLIDB [16] is composed of the following stages: analysis of the database semantic; obtaining a query corpus from potential users; classification of this corpus in categories (similar to the ones defined in [4]) whose definition is linked with a relationship; definition of useful concepts to answer queries; identification of relations and concepts in the knowledge base; and connecting query elements with concepts and relations that explain the database semantics.…”
Section: Customization Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%