2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A portable Raman sensor for the rapid discrimination of olives according to fruit quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…150 Similarly, in a subsequent study, these two kinds of coffee were discriminated by using FT-Raman. 152 Different from the other studies on olive oil, Gouvinhas et al, produced extra virgin olive oil by means of taking samples from three types of olive in different stages of their ripening periods. The discrimination of the coffees was performed by calculating the "spectral kahweol index" with the spectra obtained from the samples with different geographical origins.…”
Section: Coffeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…150 Similarly, in a subsequent study, these two kinds of coffee were discriminated by using FT-Raman. 152 Different from the other studies on olive oil, Gouvinhas et al, produced extra virgin olive oil by means of taking samples from three types of olive in different stages of their ripening periods. The discrimination of the coffees was performed by calculating the "spectral kahweol index" with the spectra obtained from the samples with different geographical origins.…”
Section: Coffeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discriminant analysis provided prediction abilities of 100% for sound, 79% for frostbite, 96% for ground, and 92% for fermented olives using cross-validation. A similar study was carried out by Guzman et al 58 in 2012 with a portable Raman sensor to classify slurries coming from sound and ground milled olives. They compare soft independent modelling of class analogies (SIMCA), partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) algorithms, and the last one was the better with 100% and 97% of success for sound and ground olives respectively.…”
Section: Determination Of the Oil And Water Content Of Olive Pomacementioning
confidence: 72%
“…The best results were obtained using the KNN method, with prediction abilities of 100% for 'sound' and 97% for 'ground' in an independent validation set 58 Real-time characterisation of olive fruit and the potential characteristics of the extracted oil in olive paste RMSEP values for extractability index: 0,04%; Oil content on FW: 56 achieved a standard error of prediction of 0.92% for moisture and 0.811% for fat content. Furthermore, in 2007 Bendini et al 36 obtained an estimation error of 1.29% and 0.67% for moisture and fat content, respectively.…”
Section: Determination Of the Oil And Water Content Of Olive Pomacementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Application fields such as genetics, combined with increasing computing power, have prompted some of these developments [14], [34], [36], [54]. The classification of plants has clearly played an important role in the fields of biology [31], [55], [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%