2004
DOI: 10.21314/jor.2004.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A portfolio optimization model for corporate bonds subject to credit risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We apply the proposed change of measure to the historical kernel estimated from the data and obtain risk neutral transition probabilities. For the illustration purpose we have considered current yield for all the credit risky bonds and the risk free government bond from Akutsu et al (2003) and risk premium adjustments from Kijima and Komoribayashi (1998). Average returns for each period is obtained taking the average of the returns simulated for the two sectors over all the scenarios.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We apply the proposed change of measure to the historical kernel estimated from the data and obtain risk neutral transition probabilities. For the illustration purpose we have considered current yield for all the credit risky bonds and the risk free government bond from Akutsu et al (2003) and risk premium adjustments from Kijima and Komoribayashi (1998). Average returns for each period is obtained taking the average of the returns simulated for the two sectors over all the scenarios.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models for credit quality based on ratings are also frequently used in the pricing and risk management literature, see for example Jarrow et al (1997); Kijima and Komoribayashi (1998); Akutsu et al (2003). In 1997, Jarrow et al (1997 applied for the first time Markov processes to capture the time evolution of credit ratings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation of the loan portfolio problem we propose in this paper harnesses the historical loan performance data commonly available and facilitates the treatment of the large problems that are common in practice. Andersson, Mausser, Rosen & Uryasev (2001), Akutsu, Kijima & Komoribayashi (2004), Kraft & Steffensen (2008), Meindl & Primbs (2006), Wise & Bhansali (2002), and others study static and dynamic corporate bond portfolio selection problems using expected utility or other objectives. Capponi & Figueroa-Lopez (2014) and Capponi, Figueroa-Lopez & Pascucci (2015) develop regime-switching models to address the dynamic asset allocation problem in defaultable markets.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aftermath of the economic shock during the turbulent 1970s, research began to refine the portfolio concept and introduced measures on how to account for business and economic risks (Reilly & Joehnk, 1976). It then advanced to simulating the impact of rating transitions into the choice of bonds in compliance with the investor's readiness to assume risk (see, e.g., Akutsu, Kijima, & Komoribayashi, 2003; Fabozzi & Tunaru, 2007; Lucas et al, 2001; Schäftner, 2008). Especially in recent years, the incorporation of such events into the optimization of bond portfolios gained much attention.…”
Section: Five Themes Most Critical To Key Stakeholders Of Creditmentioning
confidence: 99%