In 2000, the authors found endemic infections of mouse hepatitis virus, minute virus of mice, Syphacia obvelata, and Myobia musculi among mice in a large barrier facility at the University of Mainz. To eliminate the infections, they subdivided the facility into two distinct hygiene units. However, architectural constraints made it impossible to completely separate the HVAC systems of both hygiene units and to establish adequate personnel locks. To compensate for these suboptimal barrier conditions of the two newly established units, the authors replaced the open-top caging and open-servicing system with filter-top cages that were manipulated in cage-changing stations. The authors then depopulated the two units in series, independently eliminating the contaminated mice and restocking the units with SPF animals. In spite of the high infection pressure and the suboptimal barrier conditions, the authors had only a single case of recontamination.Mouse strains with defined genetic mutations continue to play a pivotal role in biomedical research. In the year 2000 alone, an estimated 25 million mice were used in biomedical experiments 1 . Since intercurrent infections of laboratory mice with pathogenic microorganisms can severely confound experimental results 2 , murine facilities have to be adequately protected against specific infections and must establish suitable microbiological monitoring programs 3,4 . The classical model for protecting laboratory rodents against infection involves three elements: physical barriers supplied by separate HEPA-filtered HVAC systems that provide positive pressure for the inhibition of airborne infections, autoclaves for the sterilization of animal supply material, and wet or dry personnel locks. If, in spite of all countermeasures, a specific pathogen infiltrates such a barrier facility, the common strategy for decontamination involves complete depopulation of the unit and subsequent restocking with pathogen-free rodents. This drastic strategy clearly has the best chance of success; however, it requires that animal housing be completely (albeit temporarily) cleared, potentially presenting serious problems for researchers who use mice.Filter-top and individually ventilated cages (microisolator cages) strictly serviced in cage-changing stations are now well established as efficient physical barriers against microorganisms. The efficacy of microisolator cages in slowing the spread of even highly infective laboratory animal pathogens has been demonstrated in several controlled studies [5][6][7][8] . However, controlled studies involve specific and well-defined cage-changing and sanitation procedures and are thus of only limited value for predicting the suitability of microisolator caging systems under less-controlled real-world conditions.Here we report the elimination of two viral pathogens (mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) and minute virus of mice (MVM)) and two parasites (the pinworm Syphacia obvelata and the fur mite Myobia musculi) from a mouse facility by separating the area into two uni...