2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A possibilistic-valued multi-criteria decision-making support for marketing activities in e-commerce: Feedback Based Diagnosis System

Abstract: In this paper we propose a multi-criteria decision making support system, called a ''Feedback Based Diagnosis System" (FBDS), to aid the marketing team of an e-commerce (EC) organisation in its activities. The FBDS database is composed of customers' satisfaction measures. These measures are related to the different services an EC offers to its customers. Thus, they constitute a multi-criteria (MC) evaluation of EC performances. In the general framework of recommender systems, these available MC evaluations are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is different, as we do not rely on users but rather on information about the Web data table origins to compute a reliability estimations. Among methods proposing solutions to evaluate trust or data quality in web applications, the method presented in [3] is close to the method presented in the paper. It uses possibility theory evidence theory, whereas we base our method on evidence theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach is different, as we do not rely on users but rather on information about the Web data table origins to compute a reliability estimations. Among methods proposing solutions to evaluate trust or data quality in web applications, the method presented in [3] is close to the method presented in the paper. It uses possibility theory evidence theory, whereas we base our method on evidence theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses possibility theory evidence theory, whereas we base our method on evidence theory. Another difference is that in our approach global information is obtained by a fusion of multiple uncertainty models, while in [3] global information results from the propagation of uncertainty models through a aggregation function. Each method has its pro and cons: it is easier to integrate interactions between criteria in aggregation functions, while it is easier to retrieve explanations of the final result in our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among methods proposing solutions to evaluate trust or data quality in web applications, the method presented in [13] for recommendation systems is close to our proposal, but uses possibility theory as a basis for evaluations rather than belief functions. Another difference between this approach and ours is that global information is not obtained by a fusion of multiple uncertainty models, but by the propagation of uncertain criteria through an aggregation function (e.g., a weighted mean).…”
Section: B Related Notionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…all the sub-criteria that can be effective in this decision process will not be included in this stage of the study and all the criteria are supposed to be independent. In the literature, during the last years, many studies have been published about marketing strategy selection and strategic marketing; by Rekik et al, proposing a multi-criteria decision making support system to aid the marketing strategy selection in e-commerce 6 , by Tsai et al, proposing an integrated model for evaluating airlines' websites effectiveness which is based on the perspectives of ''marketing mix 4Ps'' and ''website quality'' for the web-based marketing using the ANP 11 , by Liao, proposing a method that will guide the product development team to select the best marketing strategy by taking into account the price level and product/market segmentation 12 , and by Wang, providing a reference for planning brand marketing with a hybrid MCDM model combining the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) with ANP and VIKOR methods 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%