2020
DOI: 10.1017/jpa.2020.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A possible Cambrian stem-group gnathiferan-chaetognath from the Weeks Formation (Miaolingian) of Utah

Abstract: In recent years the plethora of ‘weird wonders,’ the vernacular for the apparently extinct major body plans documented in many of the Cambrian Lagerstätten, has been dramatically trimmed. This is because various taxa have been either assigned to known phyla or accommodated in larger monophyletic assemblages. Nevertheless, a number of Cambrian taxa retain their enigmatic status. To this intriguing roster we add Dakorhachis thambus n. gen. n. sp. from the Miaolingian (Guzhangian) Weeks Formation Konservat-Lagers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enabled us to exclude the taxa that only occur in stratigraphic intervals barren of non-biomineralized fossils, such as the lower and upper parts of the Marjum Formation or the lower part of the Weeks Formation. We then updated the resulting dataset to include omitted ( Caron, Conway Morris & Cameron, 2013 ) or more recently published contributions ( Conway Morris et al, 2015 ; Maletz & Steiner, 2015 ; Smith, 2015 ; Foster & Gaines, 2016 ; Pates, Daley & Ortega-Hernández, 2017 ; Lerosey-Aubril & Pates, 2018 ; Lerosey-Aubril & Skabelund, 2018 ; Lerosey-Aubril et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Pates, Daley & Lieberman, 2018 ; Pates, Daley & Ortega-Hernández, 2018 ; Conway Morris et al, 2020 ; Lerosey-Aubril, Skabelund & Ortega-Hernández, 2020 ) and some new discoveries (R. Lerosey-Aubril, 2019, personal observation). Finally, we complemented the database with information on lifestyle for each taxon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enabled us to exclude the taxa that only occur in stratigraphic intervals barren of non-biomineralized fossils, such as the lower and upper parts of the Marjum Formation or the lower part of the Weeks Formation. We then updated the resulting dataset to include omitted ( Caron, Conway Morris & Cameron, 2013 ) or more recently published contributions ( Conway Morris et al, 2015 ; Maletz & Steiner, 2015 ; Smith, 2015 ; Foster & Gaines, 2016 ; Pates, Daley & Ortega-Hernández, 2017 ; Lerosey-Aubril & Pates, 2018 ; Lerosey-Aubril & Skabelund, 2018 ; Lerosey-Aubril et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Pates, Daley & Lieberman, 2018 ; Pates, Daley & Ortega-Hernández, 2018 ; Conway Morris et al, 2020 ; Lerosey-Aubril, Skabelund & Ortega-Hernández, 2020 ) and some new discoveries (R. Lerosey-Aubril, 2019, personal observation). Finally, we complemented the database with information on lifestyle for each taxon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the myriad worm-like taxa with similar overall dimensions (e.g. [14,64,65]), perhaps the most relevant is Acosmia maotiania [66], a Chengjiang fossil with lateral tubes alongside its gut (see figs 1 and 3 of [66]). However, Iotuba and Acosmia differ in almost every morphological detail.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ipoliknus [70] bears ‘sclerites’ that resemble the robust, cuticularized papillae of Iotuba , so conceivably also belongs to the papilla-bearing subclade of Cirratuliformia [24]—though available material is inadequate to substantiate this hypothesis. Detailed comparison with the undescribed ‘New Taxon 1’ [32,66] or Dakorhachis [65], whose segmented trunk and cage of terminal spines are somewhat reminiscent of Iotuba , is precluded by the limited preservation of available material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the relationships among Trochozoa are far from being resolved, namely the monophyly of Polyzoa (Bryozoa + Entoprocta + Cycliophora) has regained credit recently ( Khalturin et al 2022 ; but see ( Nesnidal et al 2013 ; Kocot 2016 ; Bleidorn 2019 ; Laumer et al 2019 ). Outside Trochozoa, Rouphozoa (Platyhelminthes + Gastrotricha) and Chaetognathifera (Syndermata + Micrognathozoa + Gnathostomulida + Chaetognatha) are supported by most of the phylogenetic analyses ( Struck et al 2014 ; Laumer et al 2015 ; Kocot et al 2017 ; Laumer et al 2019 ; Conway Morris et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%