1995
DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)00182-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A possible deficiency in estimates of wet deposition obtained from data generated by the NADP/NTN network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing undertaken to determine experimentally the rate and amount of precipitation needed to initiate the uncovering sequence indicates that for application of fine droplets at a rate ≈0.02 mL s −1 there is no systematic variability with temperature or wind speed, and WD capture would conservatively commence after approximately 15 s. However, the data suggest the delay to sample capture may increase to 5 minutes for liquid application to the sensor head of approximately 0.001 mL s −1 (equivalent to a rainfall rate of 1.4 mm h −1 ). These results thus offer some empirical evidence for the assertions of Claassen and Halm (1995) that the data collected using this type of instrument represent conservative estimates of the actual WD flux due to exclusion of some (likely non-negligible) fraction of light precipitation events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Testing undertaken to determine experimentally the rate and amount of precipitation needed to initiate the uncovering sequence indicates that for application of fine droplets at a rate ≈0.02 mL s −1 there is no systematic variability with temperature or wind speed, and WD capture would conservatively commence after approximately 15 s. However, the data suggest the delay to sample capture may increase to 5 minutes for liquid application to the sensor head of approximately 0.001 mL s −1 (equivalent to a rainfall rate of 1.4 mm h −1 ). These results thus offer some empirical evidence for the assertions of Claassen and Halm (1995) that the data collected using this type of instrument represent conservative estimates of the actual WD flux due to exclusion of some (likely non-negligible) fraction of light precipitation events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Prado-Fiedler, 1990), though the variance explanation for the power law fit is lower than in a study by Garban et al (2004) of bulk N deposition collected at sites in France. Hence, although tests conducted at lower flow rates yielded highly varying triggering times due to difficulties in consistent application of such low liquid volumes using a spray bottle, the results of these experiments offer some empirical evidence for the assertions of Claassen and Halm (1995) that the data collected using this type of instrument represent conservative estimates of the actual WD flux due to exclusion of some (likely non-negligible) fraction of light precipitation events.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Aerochem Wet-dry Samplermentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We focus on the average number of rainy days per month during winter, because the monthly aerosol concentrations are more strongly affected by the number of rainy days (even with small precipitation amounts) rather than by the total intensity of the monthly precipitation (Claassen and Halm, 1995). We define a rainy day as a day with precipitation > 1 mm at a given gridbox.…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%