A possible role of the norepinephrine system during sequential cognitive flexibility – Evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data

Giller, Franziska; Mückschel, Moritz; Ziemssen, Tjalf; Beste, Christian

doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.008

Cited by 12 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Source location analysis found that the activity of the right lower frontal gyrus (rIFG/BA47) was related to the above-mentioned P1-blocking effect ( Dippel and Beste, 2015 ; Stock et al, 2016 ; Bodmer and Beste, 2017 ; Giller and Beste, 2019 ). The developmental studies on the BI effect found that, for adults and adolescents, over the posterior parietal sites, the BI condition evoked a larger target-P1 than the base condition, whereas there was no such BI effect in the P1 amplitude for elderly adults ( Giller and Beste, 2019 ; Giller et al, 2020 ). This finding shows that the elderly could not inhibit the blocking effect by strengthening the inhibitory gating mechanism.…”

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Bimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When the CSI was short, the processing of the target also included the proactive control of cue processing. Giller et al (2019 , 2020) found that when the cue was not fully processed, the BI effect was first reflected in the early components, such as the positive waves over the parietal sites and negative waves over the frontal-to-central sites during 100–200 ms after the target presentation ( Zhang et al, 2016b , 2017 ; Giller and Beste, 2019 ; Giller et al, 2019 ). Under the AB A sequence, in trial N-1, the inhibition of the executed task of trial N-2 was regarded as a blocking effect ( Giller and Beste, 2019 ).…”

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Bimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several recent studies have adopted the modality switching task ( Zhang et al, 2016a , 2017 ; Wolff et al, 2018 ; Giller and Beste, 2019 ; Giller et al, 2019 , 2020 ). In the experiment by Koch et al (2004) , two tasks included numerical judgment tasks (parity and size), and the third task was a simple reaction task, requiring the simultaneous pressing of two reaction keys when the stimulus appears.…”

Section: Experimental Paradigmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When the simpler stimuli and shortened cue-stimulus interval (CSI) were used, the BI effect in the cue processing stage appeared in an earlier time window ( Giller and Beste, 2019 ; Giller et al, 2019 , 2020 ) than that of Sinai et al (2007) . Giller and Beste (2019) found that for young adults, the cue-P1 amplitude was smaller in BI conditions than in the base condition over the parietal sites, whereas for the elderly group, who had a larger BI effect in behavior performance, such cue-P1 effect was not observed.…”

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Bimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review

Chen

2022

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Task switching is one of the typical paradigms to study cognitive control. When switching back to a recently inhibited task (e.g., “A” in an ABA sequence), the performance is often worse compared to a task without N-2 task repetitions (e.g., CBA). This difference is called the backward inhibitory effect (BI effect), which reflects the process of overcoming residual inhibition from a recently performed task (i.e., deinhibition). The neural mechanism of backward inhibition and deinhibition has received a lot of attention in the past decade. Multiple brain regions, including the frontal lobe, parietal, basal ganglia, and cerebellum, are activated during deinhibition. The event-related potentials (ERP) studies have shown that deinhibition process is reflected in the P1/N1 and P3 components, which might be related to early attention control, context updating, and response selection, respectively. Future research can use a variety of new paradigms to separate the neural mechanisms of BI and deinhibition.

show abstract

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Bimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Bimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Paradigmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Electrophysiological Correlates Of Bimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review

Chen

2022

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the factors affecting self-regulation is cognitive flexibility (Rubio & et al, 2014) which as one of the important factors in social interactions shows the ability to review the program when it fails or encounters obstacles (Fuss & et al, 2021). Cognitive flexibility refers to the degree to which individuals experience internal and external experiences, which determines the type of individual response to new experiences and requires the ability to communicate with the present and the power to differentiate oneself from internal thoughts and experiences (Giller & et al, 2020). ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of Self-regulation based on Cognitive Flexibility with Mediated Role of Psychological Hardiness in Students

Vaziri

Panah

Tajalli

2021

Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of present research was determine the modeling of self-regulation based on cognitive flexibility with mediated role of psychological hardiness in students. Methodology: The present study was descriptive, correlational type. The research population was all secondary high school students of Tehran city in academic years of 2019-20, which from them 499 students were selected by step cluster sampling method. Data were collected by self-regulation questionnaire (Bouffard & et al, 1995), cognitive flexibility inventory (Dennis & Vander Wal, 2010) and psychological hardiness scale (Lang & Goulet, 2003) and analyzed by structural equation modeling method in SPSS-22 and Amos-21 software. Findings: The findings showed that the model of self-regulation based on cognitive flexibility with mediated role of psychological hardiness in students had a good fit. Also, cognitive flexibility on psychological hardiness and psychological hardiness on selfregulation had significant direct effect (P<0.001), while cognitive flexibility on self-regulation had not significant direct effect (P>0.05). In Addition, cognitive flexibility with mediated of psychological hardiness on self-regulation had significant indirect effect (P=0.009). Conclusion:Regarded to the results, school counselors and psychologists can via increasing cognitive flexibility and psychological hardiness directly and indirectly led to improve selfregulation of students.

show abstract

Early life stress, literacy and dyslexia: an evolutionary perspective

Kershner

2024

Brain Struct Funct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stress and learning co-evolved in parallel, with their interdependence critical to the survival of the species. Even today, the regulation of moderate levels of stress by the central autonomic network (CAN), especially during pre- and post-natal periods, facilitates biological adaptability and is an essential precursor for the cognitive requisites of learning to read. Reading is a remarkable evolutionary achievement of the human brain, mysteriously unusual, because it is not pre-wired with a genetic address to facilitate its acquisition. There is no gene for reading. The review suggests that reading co-opts a brain circuit centered in the left hemisphere ventral occipital cortex that evolved as a domain-general visual processor. Its adoption by reading depends on the CAN’s coordination of the learning and emotional requirements of learning to read at the metabolic, cellular, synaptic, and network levels. By stabilizing a child’s self-control and modulating the attention network’s inhibitory controls over the reading circuit, the CAN plays a key role in school readiness and learning to read. In addition, the review revealed two beneficial CAN evolutionary adjustments to early-life stress “overloads” that come with incidental costs of school under-performance and dyslexia. A short-term adaptation involving methylation of the FKBP5 and NR3C1 genes is a liability for academic achievement in primary school. The adaptation leading to dyslexia induces alterations in BDNF trafficking, promoting long-term adaptive fitness by protecting against excessive glucocorticoid toxicity but risks reading difficulties by disruptive signaling from the CAN to the attention networks and the reading circuit.

show abstract

A possible role of the norepinephrine system during sequential cognitive flexibility – Evidence from EEG and pupil diameter data

Cited by 12 publications

References 68 publications

Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review

Cognitive Neural Mechanism of Backward Inhibition and Deinhibition: A Review

Modeling of Self-regulation based on Cognitive Flexibility with Mediated Role of Psychological Hardiness in Students

Early life stress, literacy and dyslexia: an evolutionary perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About