2018
DOI: 10.1080/10130950.2018.1433362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A postcolonial feminist critique of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A South African application

Abstract: By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Weitz et al (2018) highlight the strong positive influence that some gender related targets have for the achievement of other goals. Gender equality is often conceived narrowly in development strategies (Miller and Razavi 1995;Struckmann 2018), and Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) categorization of types of goals related to how the seed initiatives engage with them. Labels (very low, low, high and very high) summarized the mean values of the clusters for the 5 variables considered in the HCA this matches the pattern we see in our sample in which many of the seeds only address one or a few gender equality related targets rather than many, for example, accounting for a certain percentage of women participants in the project, giving micro-credits for fostering women entrepreneurship, creating green-business opportunities for women to work or developing business skill training programs for women.…”
Section: Different Ways Local Initiatives Are Addressing the 2030 Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weitz et al (2018) highlight the strong positive influence that some gender related targets have for the achievement of other goals. Gender equality is often conceived narrowly in development strategies (Miller and Razavi 1995;Struckmann 2018), and Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) categorization of types of goals related to how the seed initiatives engage with them. Labels (very low, low, high and very high) summarized the mean values of the clusters for the 5 variables considered in the HCA this matches the pattern we see in our sample in which many of the seeds only address one or a few gender equality related targets rather than many, for example, accounting for a certain percentage of women participants in the project, giving micro-credits for fostering women entrepreneurship, creating green-business opportunities for women to work or developing business skill training programs for women.…”
Section: Different Ways Local Initiatives Are Addressing the 2030 Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 The emphasis on formalization in the SDGs reflects the role of powerful, well-funded civil society organizations, largely from rich and middle-income countries 47,48 and too often lacking representation of workers. 20 Official ''invited spaces of participation'' 49 often limit dissent, discourage critical examination of underlying economic imaginaries, and carry unspoken, exclusionary codes of acceptable behavior that reflect elite norms, values, behaviors, and codes of dress. Not uncommonly, policy elites interpret expressions of worker power as illegitimate, such as waste pickers blockading dumps to protect their livelihoods.…”
Section: Informal Work and (Un)sustainable Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, several scholars and civil society representatives have criticised the SDGs for buttressing the status quo (Smith 2018), adhering to a neoliberal framework (Struckmann 2018), and failing to address "structural power relations" (Esquivel 2016). Jeffrey Smith (2018) points to the glaring absence of the word "democracy" in the 17 SDGs.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks: the Lack Of A Transformative Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%