2016
DOI: 10.1007/1345_2016_259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Posteriori De-aliasing of Ocean Tide Error in Future Double-Pair Satellite Gravity Missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visser (2010) investigated a number of (post-)processing methods, including the temporal filtering of timeseries of gravity field solutions, the spatial smoothing of these timeseries and evaluation of solutions for different geographical regions for GRACE-type single-pair and Bender-type (Bender et al 2008) double pair missions. An a posteriori method for de-aliasing of OT errors in future double-pair missions was proposed by Liu et al (2016), also giving hints about optimal choices for orbit constellations to mitigate OT aliasing effects. Liu & Sneeuw (2021) describe OT aliasing as a two-step mechanism, with orbit sampling as the first step and gravity recovery as the second step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visser (2010) investigated a number of (post-)processing methods, including the temporal filtering of timeseries of gravity field solutions, the spatial smoothing of these timeseries and evaluation of solutions for different geographical regions for GRACE-type single-pair and Bender-type (Bender et al 2008) double pair missions. An a posteriori method for de-aliasing of OT errors in future double-pair missions was proposed by Liu et al (2016), also giving hints about optimal choices for orbit constellations to mitigate OT aliasing effects. Liu & Sneeuw (2021) describe OT aliasing as a two-step mechanism, with orbit sampling as the first step and gravity recovery as the second step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary alias periods of eight constituents, calculated with primary alias periods as signal period and recovery period as sampling period are listed in Table 2. The secondary alias period can be demonstrated by spectral analysis of the time series of recovered fields (Liu et al 2016). The recovery period in our simulations is 11 solar days, within which the groundtrack distribution is sufficiently homogeneous to allow a gravity recovery (up to degree and order 60).…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We use it here for the purpose of a more precise estimation of the main frequency. Liu et al (2016) validated the mean PSD by checking whether different areas have different alias periods. It was demonstrated that the PSD patterns are spatially similar, i.e., they do have the same main frequency, albeit with slightly variable energy.…”
Section: Simulation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visser (2010) investigated a number of (post-)processing methods, including the temporal filtering of timeseries of gravity field solutions, the spatial smoothing of these timeseries and evaluation of solutions for different geographical regions for GRACE-type single-pair and Bender-type (Bender et al 2008) double pair missions. An a posteriori method for de-aliasing of OT errors in future double-pair missions was proposed by Liu et al (2016), also giving hints about optimal choices for orbit constellations to mitigate OT aliasing effects. Liu & Sneeuw (2021) describe OT aliasing as a two-step mechanism, with orbit sampling as the first step and gravity recovery as the second step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%