2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10625-005-0237-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Posteriori Error Estimates for Approximate Solutions of Linear Parabolic Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider the multiharmonic finite element (MhFE) approximations of the reduced optimality system, and derive guaranteed and fully computable bounds for the discretization errors. For this purpose, we use the functional a posteriori error estimation techniques earlier introduced by S. Repin, see, e.g., the papers on parabolic problems [32,13] as well as on optimal control problems [11,12], the books [33,29] and the references therein. In particular, our functional a posteriori error analysis uses the techniques close to those suggested in [32], but the analysis contains essential changes due to the MhFEM setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the multiharmonic finite element (MhFE) approximations of the reduced optimality system, and derive guaranteed and fully computable bounds for the discretization errors. For this purpose, we use the functional a posteriori error estimation techniques earlier introduced by S. Repin, see, e.g., the papers on parabolic problems [32,13] as well as on optimal control problems [11,12], the books [33,29] and the references therein. In particular, our functional a posteriori error analysis uses the techniques close to those suggested in [32], but the analysis contains essential changes due to the MhFEM setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which are not included in (12) and contribute to the irremovable gap between the error and the estimate.…”
Section: Model Problem and Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.90 · 10 −4 2.87 · 10 −4 1.23 Q (6) 3.20 · 10 −4 4.68 · 10 −4 1.21 Q (8) 4.26 · 10 −4 6.21 · 10 −4 1.21 Q (10) 5.02 · 10 −4 7.37 · 10 −4 1.21 Q (12) 5.49 · 10 −4 8.17 · 10 −4 1.22 Q (14) 5.76 · 10 −4 8.69 · 10 −4 1.23 rapidly oscillating on Q, produces approximations changing in time that are depicted in Figure 16. Here, the approximate solution is reproduced on the fixed mesh T h (411 ND) and with K = 15 time steps.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations