2009
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-09-02235-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori error estimator and error control for contact problems

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we consider two error estimators for one-body contact problems. The first error estimator is defined in terms of H(div)-conforming stress approximations and equilibrated fluxes while the second is a standard edge-based residual error estimator without any modification with respect to the contact. We show reliability and efficiency for both estimators. Moreover, the error is bounded by the first estimator with a constant one plus a higher order data oscillation term plus a term arising … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore clear that it does not spoil the efficiency of the error estimate. We note that Weiss and Wohlmuth [15] observed a similar phenomenon when they considered inequality constraints on the boundary of the domain Ω. On the other hand, Repin [12] considered the hypercircle method without the regularity assumption of the active set, and his result is closer to the classical estimates than to our result with the hypercircle method.…”
Section: J(v)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…It is therefore clear that it does not spoil the efficiency of the error estimate. We note that Weiss and Wohlmuth [15] observed a similar phenomenon when they considered inequality constraints on the boundary of the domain Ω. On the other hand, Repin [12] considered the hypercircle method without the regularity assumption of the active set, and his result is closer to the classical estimates than to our result with the hypercircle method.…”
Section: J(v)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…After the pioneering works [13] by Hlaváček, Haslinger, Nečas, and Lovíšek (see Theorem 4.2 in this book) and [1] by Ainsworth, Oden, and Lee, a huge amount of work has been performed on the a posteriori analysis of variational inequalities, see, e.g., [2], [5], [11], [14], [16], [19], [20], and the references therein. It can be noted that, in [11], a mixed problem coupling a variational equality and an inequality is also considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work related to the obstacle problem can be found in [16,17,18,19,28,33,46] and in [5,10,23,31,44]. Related to the work on the Signorini problem, we refer to [4,28,38,42,30] for a priori error analysis and to [9,34,35,48] for a posteriori analysis. The analysis in [35,48] is for a mixed formulation of the Signorini problem introducing a Lagrange multiplier and the analysis in [9,34] is for a simplified Signorini problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to the work on the Signorini problem, we refer to [4,28,38,42,30] for a priori error analysis and to [9,34,35,48] for a posteriori analysis. The analysis in [35,48] is for a mixed formulation of the Signorini problem introducing a Lagrange multiplier and the analysis in [9,34] is for a simplified Signorini problem. Also refer to the recent work in [40] for the a posteriori error control of conforming methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%