2001
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/21.2.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posteriori L2 error estimation on anisotropic tetrahedral finite element meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
102
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the companion article [8] will be concerned with the derivation of computable a posteriori error bounds, and their implementation within automatic hp-anisotropic adaptive software, the current paper will focus on a priori error estimation. To this end, the proofs of the a priori error bounds presented in this article are based on exploiting the analysis developed in [10], which assumed that the underlying computational mesh is shape-regular and that the polynomial approximation orders are isotropic, together with the anisotropic hp-approximation results presented in [6]; for related work on anisotropic approximation theory, see [1,3,4,7,15,16], for example, and the references cited therein. We also refer to the recent article [7], where the goal-oriented error analysis of the interior penalty DGFEM on anisotropic computational meshes, assuming that the polynomial degree is kept fixed, has been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the companion article [8] will be concerned with the derivation of computable a posteriori error bounds, and their implementation within automatic hp-anisotropic adaptive software, the current paper will focus on a priori error estimation. To this end, the proofs of the a priori error bounds presented in this article are based on exploiting the analysis developed in [10], which assumed that the underlying computational mesh is shape-regular and that the polynomial approximation orders are isotropic, together with the anisotropic hp-approximation results presented in [6]; for related work on anisotropic approximation theory, see [1,3,4,7,15,16], for example, and the references cited therein. We also refer to the recent article [7], where the goal-oriented error analysis of the interior penalty DGFEM on anisotropic computational meshes, assuming that the polynomial degree is kept fixed, has been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For preconditioning a Jacobi, an Yserentant [5], or a BPX [6] preconditioner can be selected. Phase V: In the last phase the error is estimated with a residual based error estimator [7]. If the error for a volume deviates within a predefined threshold value from the maximum error, it is labeled for refinement.…”
Section: Adaptive 3-dimensional Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to measure the alignment of an anisotropic mesh T h with an anisotropic function v, a so-called matching function has been proposed by Kunert [11,12]. …”
Section: Matching Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If however the anisotropic mesh is not aligned with the solution then m 1 can be arbitrarily large (cf. [13,Numerical experiment 2] or [11,Rem. 3.3]).…”
Section: Matching Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%