2000
DOI: 10.1163/156853800507336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posthatching developmental staging table for the long-toed salamander, Ambystoma macrodactylum krausei

Abstract: A posthatching developmental staging table for the larval phase of an ambystomatid salamander is provided for the first time. Stage boundaries are based upon limb development prior to the metamorphic transition and upon gill resorption during metamorphosis. Comparison to other published staging tables for salamanders of other families and anecdotal accounts of other ambystomatids is made, and similarities and differences are noted. These comparative data suggest that limb development may differ between species… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We quantified activity of freeswimming larvae as soon as larval yolk sacs were depleted (12.0-17.5 mm total length; post-hatching stages 4-8 ( Watson & Russell 2000)). Test chambers were modified 12 ml test tubes that were oriented horizontally with the open end blocked and lines marked every 12 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantified activity of freeswimming larvae as soon as larval yolk sacs were depleted (12.0-17.5 mm total length; post-hatching stages 4-8 ( Watson & Russell 2000)). Test chambers were modified 12 ml test tubes that were oriented horizontally with the open end blocked and lines marked every 12 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larvae were then returned to the laboratory and transferred to a Ϫ80ЊC freezer until radioimmunoassays could be performed. An additional larvae N p 10 from each pond were collected to determine body mass and developmental stage (Watson and Russell 2000) distributions at each site (table 1) and were subsequently released. The Watson and Russell (2000) staging scheme for larval Ambystoma development defines developmental stages as follows: forelimb development during stages 1-9, hind limb growth during stages 10-18, and finally gill reduction leading to metamorphosis during stages 19-22.…”
Section: Field Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tables often focus on either embryonic and larval development (Oyama, 1930;Glü ckson, 1931;Anderson, 1943;Harrison, 1969;Hara and Boterenbrood, 1977;Bordzilovskaya et al, 1989;Collazo and Marks, 1994;Nye et al, 2003;Wong and Liversage, 2005;Ringia and Lips, 2007) or metamorphosis (Wilder, 1925;Grant, 1930Grant, , 1931Norman, 1985;Watson and Russell, 2000). The developmental criteria of metamorphic tables often rely on features not found in direct-developing plethodontids, such as tail fin height (Norman, 1985) or the presence of balancers and larval pigment patterns (Glü ckson, 1931), which makes explicit comparisons with Plethodon cinereus impossible.…”
Section: Other Salamander Staging Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite is true for D. aeneus, which has hind limb digit development divided into three additional stages after the formation of all four forelimb digits. However, fore-and hind-limb bud development in both D. aeneus and P. cinereus occurs relatively concurrently in comparison to metamorphosing species in which the hind limb may form months after advanced forelimb digit formation (see Watson and Russell, 2000;Nye et al, 2003;Wong and Liversage, 2005; but see Wake and Shubin, 1998 for an exception in streamdwelling Dicamptodon). The coordination of fore-and hind limb development is relatively fixed within amniote clades, but can be extremely variable within Lissamphibia (Bininda-Emonds et al, 2007).…”
Section: Other Salamander Staging Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation