2017
DOI: 10.1017/s2071832200022288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Posthuman Data Subject? The Right to Be Forgotten and Beyond

Abstract: The general assumption in the West is that there still is an inherent difference between persons and things. This divide informs how “the human” and human subjectivity are constructed as distinct from all others. Recently, the distinction has been challenged in posthumanist theory, where it has been argued that the divide between human and nonhuman agents—or rather, bodies—is always an effect of a differential set of powers. For this reason, the boundaries between human and nonhuman are always in flux. As post… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Radin 1987, 1936-1937. 28 De Vries 2016Käll 2017, 1151. Henkilötiedon markkina-arvon määrittelystä, ks.…”
Section: Datasubjekti Ja Tiedollinen Itsemäärääminenunclassified
“…Radin 1987, 1936-1937. 28 De Vries 2016Käll 2017, 1151. Henkilötiedon markkina-arvon määrittelystä, ks.…”
Section: Datasubjekti Ja Tiedollinen Itsemäärääminenunclassified
“…Its data strategy aims at restoring a level playing field for innovation in the European data market. While the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation offers its citizens protections from privacy violations and discriminatory data processing, it may be argued that this protection itself is contingent on keeping data separate from human bodies, in order to balance the rights of human beings and digitalized flows for the purposes of digital capitalism (Käll 2017 ). Also, the adequacy determination rules 18 that the EU deploys in its trade deals instrumentalizes the political right to privacy and data protection for the purposes of economic efficiency.…”
Section: Towards a New Global Digital Constitutionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hukuk, insanı, akıllı telefon, sosyal medya ya da çevrimiçi arama motorları gibi insanolmayan diğer 'şey'lerle dijital bağlantısı vasıtasıyla kimliklendirdiğinde özneyi bedensel bütünlüğünden ayırarak mülkiyet konusu bir veri haline getirir (Käll, 2017(Käll, , s. 1156. Dijital özneyi, hukuk önünde hak ve kişilik sahibi insanın, insanlığına atfedilen değerleri yitirmesi, bir ürün ya da veri haline gelmesi anlamında kullanıyorum.…”
Section: Dijital öZne Ve Posthuman Hukukunclassified