1978
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90085-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A posttreatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
11
1
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also consistent with clinical findings 14,15,16,17 that the bond failure rate is higher with posterior teeth, than anterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also consistent with clinical findings 14,15,16,17 that the bond failure rate is higher with posterior teeth, than anterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is surprising as the lower first molar is reported to have the greatest rate of bond failure in the clinical situation. 14,15,16,17 The reason for the higher rate of bond failure for these teeth may be due to greater masticatory forces. 16 If the stresses placed upon ortho- .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported more failures in the lower dental arch, while others found no statistically significant difference between failures in the mandibular and maxillary arches. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] In the present study, more failures were found in the mandibular arch than in the maxillary arch. This difference may be attributed to occlusal interferences between the brackets of the lower and the upper dental arch during the first phase of orthodontic therapy, the gravity of the bolus of food, and the presence of more initial crowding in the lower dental arch-especially in the anterior segment-in most of the patients of this sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[15][16][17][18][19]21,[23][24][25][26][27] This finding has been attributed to higher masticatory forces exerted on posterior teeth, 19,23,28,29 access difficulties during bonding, [15][16][17]19,25,26 and differences in the micromorphology and structure of the superficial enamel layer between posterior and anterior teeth. 19,23,30 Because more failures were found in boys than in girls (P ϭ .040), it seems that the boys who participated in this study were less attentive to diet and care of the fixed appliances during the observation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,6 This may be due to the altered topography of the buccal enamel in these teeth. [9][10][11][12] Other factors could be the difficulty in moisture control during bonding in the posterior segments, heavier masticatory forces, and partial eruption of second premolars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%