1960
DOI: 10.2307/2309465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Power Series Development of the Convolution Theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convolution theorem tells us that convolution in the time domain is equivalent to multiplication in the frequency domain (Barrett and Wilde 1960). Hence, to perform graph convolution on embeddings with the convolution kernel, we only need to transform them into frequency domain by graph Fourier transform, multiply them, and transform the result back to time domain: e * g k = F −1 g F g (e) ⊙ k , where * g represents graph convolution; column vector k ∈ R M +N is convolution kernel and k = F g (k) is the corresponding frequency-domain waveform.…”
Section: Graph Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolution theorem tells us that convolution in the time domain is equivalent to multiplication in the frequency domain (Barrett and Wilde 1960). Hence, to perform graph convolution on embeddings with the convolution kernel, we only need to transform them into frequency domain by graph Fourier transform, multiply them, and transform the result back to time domain: e * g k = F −1 g F g (e) ⊙ k , where * g represents graph convolution; column vector k ∈ R M +N is convolution kernel and k = F g (k) is the corresponding frequency-domain waveform.…”
Section: Graph Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also introduce a widely-used property of convolution, which is crucial in graph convolution design: Convolution Theorem (Barrett & Wilde, 1960) tells us that convolution in the time domain is equivalent to the product in the frequency domain, i.e., f (t) * g(t) = F −1 (F(f (t))F(g(t))). For graph data, convolution is hard to define directly due to the irregular structure of graphs, thus is defined in this way.…”
Section: Convolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%