2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0784-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A powerful wild bootstrap diagnosis of panel unit roots under linear trends and time-varying volatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Monte Carlo evidence also reveals that the inference based on PB and other existing estimators in the literature can su¤er from serious size distortions in …nite samples. To deal with these problems, we consider bootstrapping critical values using Wild bootstrap by Herwartz and Walle (2018) for more accurate and more robust inference that allows for arbitrary crosssectional dependence of errors. In addition, we also implement two bias-mitigation approaches -a simulation based and split-panel jackknife methods.…”
Section: Asymptotic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monte Carlo evidence also reveals that the inference based on PB and other existing estimators in the literature can su¤er from serious size distortions in …nite samples. To deal with these problems, we consider bootstrapping critical values using Wild bootstrap by Herwartz and Walle (2018) for more accurate and more robust inference that allows for arbitrary crosssectional dependence of errors. In addition, we also implement two bias-mitigation approaches -a simulation based and split-panel jackknife methods.…”
Section: Asymptotic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve accuracy of inference, and, importantly, to be able to conduct valid inference regardless of the degree of cross-sectional dependence of errors, we adopt the Wild bootstrap procedure used by Herwartz and Walle (2018). We found this procedure to be remarkably e¤ective for all four estimators, regardless of cross-sectional dependence of errors, and we therefore recommend using it in empirical research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it would be interesting to systematically compare the performance of Simes' test with other meta tests that are less reliable if the information to be combined is not independent. A feasible path to be followed is resampling, e.g., using the wild bootstrap procedure suggested by Herwartz and Walle (2018). Table A2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%