1978
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.1978.326270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Algorithm for Solving Dynamic Membrane Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
222
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
222
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) was discretized by the standard five-point stencil 40 . Since a straightforward explicit Euler time integration requires a rather small time step of 0.001 ms for numerical stability, we used the Rush-Larsen method 41 to integrate the gating variables. Furthermore, we considered the diffusion term implicitly, since for the explicit solution, time steps would have been limited by ∆x 2 /4D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) was discretized by the standard five-point stencil 40 . Since a straightforward explicit Euler time integration requires a rather small time step of 0.001 ms for numerical stability, we used the Rush-Larsen method 41 to integrate the gating variables. Furthermore, we considered the diffusion term implicitly, since for the explicit solution, time steps would have been limited by ∆x 2 /4D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of Rush and Larsen (1978) and Victorri et al (1985) were used to improve computational efficiency.…”
Section: Model Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simple models based on HodgkinHuxley formulation this problem is normally overcome by using the Rush-Larsen (RL) method [18]. However, for the most modern and complex models that are highly based on Markov Chains, the RL method seems to be ineffective in terms of allowing larger time steps during the numerical integration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Extended Rush-Larsen Method (SAST1) The method proposed by Rush-Larsen (RL) [19] is very popular in the community of cardiac electrophysiology and focus on the gating variables from Hodgkin and Huxley's formulation [11]. This method is based on a local linearization of the equations in the form…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%