2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85739-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Application of Market-Based Mechanisms for Allocating Harvesting Tasks

Abstract: Market-based task allocation mechanisms are designed to distribute a set of tasks fairly amongst a set of agents. Such mechanisms have been shown to be highly effective in simulation and when applied to multi-robot teams. Application of such mechanisms in real-world settings can present a range of practical challenges, such as knowing what is the best point in a complex process to allocate tasks and what information to consider in determining the allocation. The work presented here explores the application of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we focus on auction-based mechanisms, which are a popular technique within the MATA and multi-robot task allocation (MRTA) literature. As described by [8,10,12,13,20], auctions are executed in rounds that are typically composed of three phases: (i) announce tasks-an auction manager advertises one or more tasks to the agents; (ii) compute bids-each agent determines its individual valuation (cost or utility) for one or more of the announced tasks and offers a bid for any relevant tasks; and (iii) determine winner-the auction manager decides which agent(s) are awarded which task(s).…”
Section: Adaption Of Mata Methodologies To Food Factory Hygiene Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we focus on auction-based mechanisms, which are a popular technique within the MATA and multi-robot task allocation (MRTA) literature. As described by [8,10,12,13,20], auctions are executed in rounds that are typically composed of three phases: (i) announce tasks-an auction manager advertises one or more tasks to the agents; (ii) compute bids-each agent determines its individual valuation (cost or utility) for one or more of the announced tasks and offers a bid for any relevant tasks; and (iii) determine winner-the auction manager decides which agent(s) are awarded which task(s).…”
Section: Adaption Of Mata Methodologies To Food Factory Hygiene Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach explored here draws specifically on two prior works in the literature: [10], where auctions are used to efficiently manage a human fruit harvesting workforce, and [22], where improvements to standard auction mechanisms have been made to tailor allocation to heterogeneous robot teams. In [10], tasks are allocated to pickers, who pick the ripe fruits, and runners, who collect the fruit from the pickers and transport it to a packing station. Round Robin, Ordered Single Item and Sequential Single Item methods are employed.…”
Section: Adaption Of Mata Methodologies To Food Factory Hygiene Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Agents bid on these tasks and an auction manager assigns each task to the agent that presents the bid with the lowest cost; the cost is computed based on an approximated duration to complete the task. The work presented in this section builds on our prior work ( Harman and Sklar, 2021a , b ). This paper presents an evaluation of our approach using the teams created as per the previous section, a comparison of the different task allocation mechanisms and an additional performance metric.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our strategy takes into consideration the practical challenges associated with transferring a laboratory approach into a real-world setting. Our previous work ( Harman and Sklar, 2021a , b ) evaluated different ratios of pickers to runners. An overview of our team allocation method appeared in an extended abstract ( Harman and Sklar, 2022a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%