2004
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.035949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, several studies have reported that results from calculated binocular visual fields are consistent with the results found when an Esterman binocular visual field test is performed. [35][36][37][38] The assessment of incident falls with 4-month follow-up postcards may not be optimal, because it may be subject to recall bias. In addition, inattention during visual field testing may be a cause of misclassification error, because participants who do not pay attention during the visual field test may miss more points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several studies have reported that results from calculated binocular visual fields are consistent with the results found when an Esterman binocular visual field test is performed. [35][36][37][38] The assessment of incident falls with 4-month follow-up postcards may not be optimal, because it may be subject to recall bias. In addition, inattention during visual field testing may be a cause of misclassification error, because participants who do not pay attention during the visual field test may miss more points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed description of binocular visual field loss was adapted from a scoring system of the integrated visual field, whereby uniocular visual field analyses are integrated into a single binocular field without additional testing, reported by Crabb and colleagues. 89,90 The definitions of health states are described in Table 1. According to whether the individual has or has not got glaucoma, he or she would start in the model in a normal state or in an undiagnosed glaucoma state.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was by a grading of the binocular visual field using the integrated visual field method as described by Crabb and colleagues (see Table 1, p. 17). 89 The responses to the EQ-5D were converted to health state utilities using UK population tariffs and analysed according to the objective and subjective assessment of glaucoma severity (Kilonzo M, University of Aberdeen: personal communication, 2006). Table 44 shows the estimates of utility for those people with an objective assessment of their glaucoma severity.…”
Section: Health State Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mogą one być szczególnie ważne u tych starszych osób, które albo nie są świadome zmian następujących w organizmie, albo nie chcą przyznać, że nie spełniają już wymagań nie tylko wzrokowych, ponieważ nie chcą zrezygnować z prowadzenia pojazdu (29). Pacjenci z ubytkami w polu widzenia spowodowanymi jaskrą, chorobami siatkówki lub zaćmą dwukrotnie częściej są sprawcami wypadków lub wykroczeń drogowych w porównaniu z osobami z pełnym polem widzenia (30). Obecnie coraz częściej używany jest termin 'przydatne pole widzenia' -UFOV (useful field of view), szczególnie w odniesieniu do pacjentów w starszym wieku, u których najczęściej spotykane jest zaburzenie tej funkcji wzrokowej.…”
Section: Wymagania Stawiane Kierowcomunclassified