2011 19th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icnp.2011.6089072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical approach to rate adaptation for multi-antenna systems

Abstract: Abstract-Multi-antenna systems can provide greater throughput and range coverage than traditional single antenna systems. A key aspect of exploiting this new physical layer (PHY) is rate adaptation, which consists of finding the best rate for sending data packets. Unlike rate adaptation in single antenna systems, nodes have many choices apart from adapting different modulation types, and these choices include using spatial multiplexing or transmit diversity, types of guard intervals, and channel width. We pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even without the training mechanism, ARAMIS outperforms other algorithms with throughput gains of up to 26% over Minstrel HT, 124% over Ath9k, and 287% over RAMAS. Note that our results for RAMAS are somewhat different from those reported [4], since they were obtained in different scenarios. RAMAS was previously evaluated only on the 2.4GHz frequency range, which significantly limits the performance benefits of 802.11n features [18], [5].…”
Section: Interference-freecontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even without the training mechanism, ARAMIS outperforms other algorithms with throughput gains of up to 26% over Minstrel HT, 124% over Ath9k, and 287% over RAMAS. Note that our results for RAMAS are somewhat different from those reported [4], since they were obtained in different scenarios. RAMAS was previously evaluated only on the 2.4GHz frequency range, which significantly limits the performance benefits of 802.11n features [18], [5].…”
Section: Interference-freecontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…We compare the performance of ARAMIS to that of two widely used open source 802.11n RA solutions, Ath9k [7] and Minstrel HT [6], and RAMAS [4], which was recently shown to be one of the best performing 802.11n RA solutions. We run RAMAS using the implementation made available by its authors.…”
Section: A Testbed Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They can be classified into frame-based [13,[26][27][28][29][30][31], SNR-based [9,[32][33][34], and PHY-layer based [9][10][11]. Frame-based algorithms are often used in practice due to their simplicity but they are slow to respond to rapidly changing channel conditions in mobile environments.…”
Section: Rate Control and Client Roamingmentioning
confidence: 99%