2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Evaluation of Rate Adaptation Algorithms in HTTP-based Adaptive Streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not propose a new ABR adaptation algorithm, instead evaluating 3 very different types of existing algorithms: Rate-based adaptation (RB) tries to fetch the next segment at a bitrate matching the estimated network bandwidth. We adapt the simple, demo implementation of this strategy provided by Bitmovin [4]. This approach requires no modifica-tion to use SEGUE's modified encoding.…”
Section: Online Playback and Rate Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not propose a new ABR adaptation algorithm, instead evaluating 3 very different types of existing algorithms: Rate-based adaptation (RB) tries to fetch the next segment at a bitrate matching the estimated network bandwidth. We adapt the simple, demo implementation of this strategy provided by Bitmovin [4]. This approach requires no modifica-tion to use SEGUE's modified encoding.…”
Section: Online Playback and Rate Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the stability in terms of quality levels is one of the significant issues to compete with HAS players. The authors in [12] discussed that a HAS player behaviour in adaptive video streaming may lead to the fairness issue when HAS clients are competing for a bottleneck link. In another study [13], the experimentation tools have been provided by introducing an evaluation framework for adaptive streaming.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, Kakhki et al found that QUIC provided better streaming QoE, but only for high-quality video [20]. Ayad et al studied the performance of commercial and open-source players and found that the QUIC protocol was quite aggressive when competing with other TCP flows and not as responsive to congestion as other TCP flows [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%