2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical expression for evaluating the small shear-mode fatigue crack threshold in bearing steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the SIFs were calculated separately here for Mode I and II cracks at the edge of the semi‐elliptic flat areas. The stress intensity ( KIitalicFAKitalicIIitalicFA) for Mode I and II cracks at the edge of the semi‐elliptic flat areas can be calculated by using the following equations 27,32 normalΔKIitalicFAgoodbreak=0.65normalΔσFAπitalicAreaitalicFA normalΔKitalicIIitalicFAgoodbreak=0.69normalΔτFAπitalicAreaitalicFA …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the SIFs were calculated separately here for Mode I and II cracks at the edge of the semi‐elliptic flat areas. The stress intensity ( KIitalicFAKitalicIIitalicFA) for Mode I and II cracks at the edge of the semi‐elliptic flat areas can be calculated by using the following equations 27,32 normalΔKIitalicFAgoodbreak=0.65normalΔσFAπitalicAreaitalicFA normalΔKitalicIIitalicFAgoodbreak=0.69normalΔτFAπitalicAreaitalicFA …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress intensity (ΔK IÀFA 、ΔK IIÀFA ) for Mode I and II cracks at the edge of the semi-elliptic flat areas can be calculated by using the following equations. 27,32…”
Section: A Change In the Mode Of Small Crack From Initiation To Propa...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, special consideration of the crack size effect is required in order to quantify fatigue strength. [26][27][28][29] Peters et al [2][3][4] introduced an FOD crater onto a Ti-6Al-4V alloy specimen with an impact velocity of 300 m/s, later performing fatigue tests at a stress ratio of 0.1. They combined residual stress, stress concentration and microcracks according to the Kitagawa-Takahashi approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%