2023
DOI: 10.3389/fsysb.2023.1174647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical guide for the generation of model-based virtual clinical trials

Abstract: Mathematical modeling has made significant contributions to drug design, development, and optimization. Virtual clinical trials that integrate mathematical models to explore patient heterogeneity and its impact on a variety of therapeutic questions have recently risen in popularity. Here, we outline best practices for creating virtual patients from mathematical models to ultimately implement and execute a virtual clinical trial. In this practical guide, we discuss and provide examples of model design, paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an opportune time to discuss what mathematical biologists and modellers, whether they apply their efforts towards (pre-)clinical and public health problems or beyond, can do to better respond to and include DEI in their models. Technical aspects could include departing from seeking a single parameterization to considering a range of parameterizations for a model to encompass observed diversity (Craig et al 2023 ), modifications of model structure to better represent differences between individuals/groups of individuals and using parameter estimation techniques that can account for heterogeneity (e.g., nonlinear mixed effects models, etc.). There is also a need to continue to develop methodologies that incorporate complexity in the form of between-subject variability (Nande et al 2021 ; Brady-Nicholls et al 2021 ; Ojwang et al 2024 ).…”
Section: Challenges For the Field Of Mathematical Biology: Where Do W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an opportune time to discuss what mathematical biologists and modellers, whether they apply their efforts towards (pre-)clinical and public health problems or beyond, can do to better respond to and include DEI in their models. Technical aspects could include departing from seeking a single parameterization to considering a range of parameterizations for a model to encompass observed diversity (Craig et al 2023 ), modifications of model structure to better represent differences between individuals/groups of individuals and using parameter estimation techniques that can account for heterogeneity (e.g., nonlinear mixed effects models, etc.). There is also a need to continue to develop methodologies that incorporate complexity in the form of between-subject variability (Nande et al 2021 ; Brady-Nicholls et al 2021 ; Ojwang et al 2024 ).…”
Section: Challenges For the Field Of Mathematical Biology: Where Do W...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review paper [21] has introduced a step-by-step best practice guide for conducting a model-based virtual clinical trial. The process that the authors' outlined can be cyclical, where knowledge gained at one step may necessitate returning to an earlier step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, we will present the steps in linear order here. A VCT begins with defining the question of interest for the study; the authors call this VCT Step 0 [21]. For instance, one may be interested in quantifying how the percent of responders changes as a function of drug dose (see Figure 3 in Craig et al [21]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response, in silico models can integrate data from various studies to help predict patient responses, optimize therapeutic regimens, and virtually test a huge number of scenarios to inform clinical trial designs. 34 Thus, the integration of mathematical and computational models is cost effective 35 , 36 and helps to reduce attrition along the drug development pipeline. Such models have been used in e.g., glioblastoma, 37 , 38 prostate cancer, 39 and ovarian cancer, 40 aiding to verify therapeutic effectiveness and illustrating the adaptability and usefulness of in silico models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%