2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023609306024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Guide to Experience-Sampling Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
176
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
176
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigated this in a daily diary study of individuals high (HSA) and low (LSA) in social anxiety. We chose a diary study, since daily measurements are suited to capture more dynamic aspects of the variables of interest within the context of everyday activities (Connor et al, 2003).…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We investigated this in a daily diary study of individuals high (HSA) and low (LSA) in social anxiety. We chose a diary study, since daily measurements are suited to capture more dynamic aspects of the variables of interest within the context of everyday activities (Connor et al, 2003).…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The palm pilot bleeped loudly for up to 13 minutes until the screen was tapped using a stylus pen. Long and loud bleeps give people the opportunity to answer more trials by not missing assessment points (Christensen et al, 2003). Each question appeared on the palm pilot screen individually, and participants responded by pressing a number with a stylus pen.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Experience Sampling Program (ESP; Barrett & Feldman Barrett, 2000) triggered the questionnaire on the PDAs at random intervals for a total of nine times a day. This sampling rate was chosen with an expectation that participants would miss some prompts (Christensen, Feldman Barrett, Bliss-Moreau, Lebo, & Kaschub, 2003). Indeed, on average, participants missed approximately 3-4 daily prompts due to a variety of situational constraints (e.g., busy, did not hear the signal; see Table 1 for average numbers of responses).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%