2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.agron.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical guide to genetic gain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average reduction of 3.18 per year in selection gain is expressive since the evaluated lines do not come from a breeding programme that exclusively aims the selection of disease‐resistant genotypes but consider, concomitantly, other agronomically important traits, such as productivity, plant height, tolerance to water deficit, culinary quality, among many others of interest to the upland rice crop, as mentioned by Botelho et al (2018). The SG is important within the breeding programme because, besides enabling the breeder to predict the selection response even before it is performed, it provides an indication of the success of the selection over the trait under evaluation (Rutkoski, 2019). The interference of multi‐character selection on selection for disease resistance can be noticed by the reduction in the magnitude of the SG values from around 50 to around 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average reduction of 3.18 per year in selection gain is expressive since the evaluated lines do not come from a breeding programme that exclusively aims the selection of disease‐resistant genotypes but consider, concomitantly, other agronomically important traits, such as productivity, plant height, tolerance to water deficit, culinary quality, among many others of interest to the upland rice crop, as mentioned by Botelho et al (2018). The SG is important within the breeding programme because, besides enabling the breeder to predict the selection response even before it is performed, it provides an indication of the success of the selection over the trait under evaluation (Rutkoski, 2019). The interference of multi‐character selection on selection for disease resistance can be noticed by the reduction in the magnitude of the SG values from around 50 to around 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where R is the response to selection per year, i is the selection intensity, r is the accuracy of selection, σ a is the additive genetic standard deviation for the trait of interest, and L is the generation interval (Lush, 1936). Assuming that breeding objectives, selection criteria, available germplasm, and target environments are well defined, the success of a breeding program is largely dependent on the optimal use of available resources to maximize the response to selection (Rutkoski, 2019). Effective breeding programs must re-evaluate breeding strategies as technology, environments, access to germplasm, and consumer needs are constantly changing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where GEBV F 10 denotes the average GEBV of the resulting 2,700 F 10 RILs; and GEBV P denotes the average GEBV of 10 parental lines selected using each strategy [23]. The larger the absolute value of the genetic gain, the greater the improvement in the target trait.…”
Section: Calculation Of Genetic Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%