2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical guide to multilevel modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
813
2
12

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,114 publications
(839 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
12
813
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first analysis, the intra-class correlation (ICC) of country was examined. The ICC was .06, indicating the proportion of total variance that occurred systematically between countries was trivial and multilevel analysis with country as Level-2 units was not necessary (Lee, 2000;Peugh, 2010). Second, the standard errors of the regression models conducted with and without multilevel analyses were compared.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first analysis, the intra-class correlation (ICC) of country was examined. The ICC was .06, indicating the proportion of total variance that occurred systematically between countries was trivial and multilevel analysis with country as Level-2 units was not necessary (Lee, 2000;Peugh, 2010). Second, the standard errors of the regression models conducted with and without multilevel analyses were compared.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the development of trait and state anxiety was plotted over the course of chemotherapy treatment. Repeated measurements of anxiety and symptom severity at different time points resulted in a nested data set, calling for an analysis approach that accounts for this higher level clustering of individuals' ratings by time to avoid type I errors and biased parameter estimations (Peugh, 2010;Shek and Ma, 2011). Therefore, longitudinal mixed model analyses were used to answer our three research questions as stated above.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-known and most frequently used method for parameter estimation is the maximum likelihood function. Furthermore, the likelihood function can be used for the calculation of the deviance, which is used for comparison of nested models (Peugh, 2010). In addition, nested or non-nested models can be compared using the Akaike information criterion ( AIC ) and the Bayesian information criterion ( BIC ) (Kwok et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no straightforward effect sizes in MLA, but generally accepted indices like the coefficient of determination Pseudo R 2 can be computed (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002). Pseudo R 2 gives the variance explanation by adding one or more predictors compared to a more restrictive model (Peugh, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation