2019
DOI: 10.1002/aorn.12895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Guide to Performance Improvement: Change Acceleration Process and Techniques to Maintain Improvements

Abstract: Performance improvement (PI) team members and leaders can use a variety of tools to help accelerate change and sustain performance for lasting success. Key factors for PI team members to consider for change management are the ability to work together to problem solve and the involvement of the project's champion or sponsor for the duration of the project. The PI team can use the Change Acceleration Process model, which includes the Threats & Opportunities Matrix; backward imaging; and the goals, roles, process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article, we present a case of recent transformational change management (CM) in the ORs of our institution that did not fit the existing CM models ( Table 1 ), 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 which were identified from a narrative literature search. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 The lack of fit was partly because many existing tools were not geared toward organizational or transformational change but instead focused on individual, developmental, or transitional changes. Additionally, no model was specific enough as a practical journey map yet generic enough to apply to this study’s novel technology CM process in the OR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this article, we present a case of recent transformational change management (CM) in the ORs of our institution that did not fit the existing CM models ( Table 1 ), 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 which were identified from a narrative literature search. 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 The lack of fit was partly because many existing tools were not geared toward organizational or transformational change but instead focused on individual, developmental, or transitional changes. Additionally, no model was specific enough as a practical journey map yet generic enough to apply to this study’s novel technology CM process in the OR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's 7 steps: Leading Change, Creating a Shared Need, Shaping a Vision, Mobilizing Commitment, Making the Change Last, Monitoring Progress, Changing Systems and Structures, enable a sustainable change. 5 Our project required joint leadership from practice, research, and administration. The CAP model’s central leadership focus could not capture the complexity of our change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%