2021
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical guide to question formation, systematic searching and study screening for literature reviews in ecology and evolution

Abstract: 1. Well-conducted systematic reviews are invaluable for synthesising research findings. The conclusions of a review depend on how the research question was formulated, how relevant studies were found and how studies were selected for synthesis.2. Here, we present a practical guide for ecologists and evolutionary biologists on formulating a question for a systematic review, and finding a representative sample of research findings.3. We explain the steps involved using a worked example and practical training exe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The references cited in publications have also been retrieved. Two researchers (Shanwei Wu and Xianni Chen) independently performed the search strategy ( Note S ) following the methods in Foo et al (2021) . All discrepancies were resolved through discussion with each other or consultation with a 3rd reviewer (Zhaoyong Shi).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The references cited in publications have also been retrieved. Two researchers (Shanwei Wu and Xianni Chen) independently performed the search strategy ( Note S ) following the methods in Foo et al (2021) . All discrepancies were resolved through discussion with each other or consultation with a 3rd reviewer (Zhaoyong Shi).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we performed a search on the specialized search engines Scopus (www.scopus.com) and Web of Science (www.webofscience.com) to find literature referring to TreMs. Identifying the relevant keywords for the search is a key part of this step (Atkinson and Cipriani, 2018;Foo et al, 2021). A wide diversity of terms, however, has been used to refer to TreMs before the terminology became more homogenized in recent years.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched the Scopus database between 16 and 18 May 2021, with a follow-up search on 1 September 2021 (see the supplementary information at https://daniel1noble.github.io/ nuisance_heterogeneity/). After a series of pilot searches to refine our search string (see Foo et al, 2021 for an overview of this process), we searched for studies that included: 'meta-analysis', 'meta regression', 'comparative analysis', 'comprehensive analysis', 'global analysis' or 'macro physiology' in their title or abstract. We restricted our search to key comparative physiology journals known to the authors that would likely contain literaturebased quantitative syntheses within the last 6 years (detailed in the supplemental tables at https://daniel1noble.github.io/nuisance_ heterogeneity/).…”
Section: Nuisance Heterogeneity Complicates Meta-analytic Interpretat...mentioning
confidence: 99%