2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-006-0061-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical method for assessment of dose conversion coefficients for aquatic biota

Abstract: Radiological impact assessment for flora and fauna requires adequate dosimetric data. Due to the variability of habitats, shapes, and masses of the non-human biota, assessment of doses is a challenging task. External and internal dose conversion coefficients for photons and electrons have been systematically calculated by Monte Carlo methods for spherical and ellipsoidal shapes in water medium. An interpolation method has been developed to approximate absorbed fractions for elliptical shape organisms from abso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Uncertainties of whole body DCC for internal exposure due to non-homogeneously distributed sources Previously reported DCCs for the internal exposure of reference organisms (Taranenko et al, 2004;Ulanovsky and Pröhl, 2006;Ulanovsky et al, 2008) were calculated assuming a homogeneous distribution of photon and electron sources within the whole body of the considered organisms. Because the defined reference organisms are approximated by elliptical phantoms without any internal structure, it seems rather meaningless to calculate new sets of DCCs for any arbitrary distribution of the internal contaminant within the organism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Uncertainties of whole body DCC for internal exposure due to non-homogeneously distributed sources Previously reported DCCs for the internal exposure of reference organisms (Taranenko et al, 2004;Ulanovsky and Pröhl, 2006;Ulanovsky et al, 2008) were calculated assuming a homogeneous distribution of photon and electron sources within the whole body of the considered organisms. Because the defined reference organisms are approximated by elliptical phantoms without any internal structure, it seems rather meaningless to calculate new sets of DCCs for any arbitrary distribution of the internal contaminant within the organism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Eq. (5) could be used to obtain a more accurate estimation of the organ dose using the corresponding values of the absorbed fraction for a spherical shape organ of a given mass in a water medium (Ulanovsky and Pröhl, 2006) to approximate fðE; S)SÞ, and the average activity concentration per unit mass in the organ, A/m.…”
Section: Estimation Of Organ Doses and Their Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utiliza modelos ecológicos para avaliar as alterações de biomassa do ecossistema, um modelo de distribuição de radionclídeos para avaliar o comportamento dos radionuclídeos nos meios bióticos e abióticos, e por fi m um modelo de avaliação de dose, promovendo uma visão integrada desde o termo fonte até a avaliação de dose. Ulanovsky & Prohl (2006) desenvolvem uma formulação matemática das possíveis geometrias dos organismos, entre eles dos peixes e, utilizando metodologia baseado em simulação de Monte Carlo aponta as frações de energia absorvida pelos peixes.…”
Section: Metodologia Para Cálculo Da Dose Absorvida -Conceitos Básicosunclassified
“…6) The absorbed energy fraction was determined by the empirical equation associated with the Monte Carlo simulation, which was developed by Ulanovsky and Pröhl. 4) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%