2014
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2014.1.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Military Ontology Construction for the Intelligent Army Tactical Command Information System

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to construct a military ontology as the core element for implementing the intelligent Army Tactical Command Information System (ATCIS). Using the military ontology, the system can automatically understand and manage the meaning of military information in the system, and hence it can provide a commander with military knowledge for decision making. To construct the military ontology, we define the core concepts of the ontology based on terms extracted from the ATCIS database and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of intelligent systems (Wilamowski and Irwin 2015) is a relevant research field, including for example industrial (Irani and Kamal 2014;Ngai et al 2014), military (Ma'sum et al 2013Yoo et al 2014) and social (Magnisalis et al 2011;Bernardini et al 2014;Adamson et al 2019) applications. In the telecare domain, personal assistants (Matsuyama et al 2016;López et al 2018) andartificial companionship (Chumkamon et al 2016;Abdollahi et al 2017) are relevant.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of intelligent systems (Wilamowski and Irwin 2015) is a relevant research field, including for example industrial (Irani and Kamal 2014;Ngai et al 2014), military (Ma'sum et al 2013Yoo et al 2014) and social (Magnisalis et al 2011;Bernardini et al 2014;Adamson et al 2019) applications. In the telecare domain, personal assistants (Matsuyama et al 2016;López et al 2018) andartificial companionship (Chumkamon et al 2016;Abdollahi et al 2017) are relevant.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The military ontology Muninn [11] defines classes and properties of military history. The article [12] describes the implementation of an ontology as a basis for the intelligent information system of the tactical command of the army of Korea. The THOR ontology [13] provides a vocabulary to describe and request the content generated by the combatant.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top-down method starts with the general classes and then divides these into sub-classes (Schreiber et al, 1995). The middle-out method starts with certain mid-level concepts and then applies the bottom-up method or the top-down method (Corcho et al, 2005;Yoo et al, 2014). The hybrid method merges ontologies developed from the bottom-up method and top-down method into one ontology (López-Pellicer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%