Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Model for Conducting Helpful Peer Review of Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other cases preliminary reports were prepared prior to the postobservation meetings and subsequently revised after the meeting with the reviewee. These modifications, as well as those documented by Bell and Cooper (2013), Buskist et al (2014), and Hitchens (2014) should inform future development of the Peer Review of Teaching process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other cases preliminary reports were prepared prior to the postobservation meetings and subsequently revised after the meeting with the reviewee. These modifications, as well as those documented by Bell and Cooper (2013), Buskist et al (2014), and Hitchens (2014) should inform future development of the Peer Review of Teaching process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They may wish to include it in their teaching dossier or application for a job, promotion and/or tenure. Additional steps such as meeting with the students, and/or post-observation meeting reflection have been described elsewhere (Buskist, Ismail, & Groccia, 2014;Hitchens, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in relation to post-observation process, supervisors claimed that they always meet with the teachers to discuss the observed lesson immediately, that they always take into account teachers' responses to their observations, and that their discussion always leaves the teacher feeling more enthusiastic about teaching. It should be noted that supervisors maintain that teachers only sometimes take account of their post-observation feedback which is often posited as an essential part of the observation process (Buskist, Ismail, & Groccia, 2014).…”
Section: Item Mean Std Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer review can be valuable and helpful, but only if integrated into a teaching and learning process that is comprehensive and supportive, rather than simply informal or judgmental (Buskist, et al, 2014). Buskist and colleagues have suggested a four-part holistic process that incorporates a pre-observation meeting to create high trust, an actual observation, creation of a detailed formal written feedback report, and a post-observation meeting emphasizing the positives identified in the review and offering specific suggestions to help the instructor to become even more effective.…”
Section: Understanding Teaching Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%