2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Overview of Case-Control Studies in Clinical Practice

Abstract: Case-control studies are one of the major observational study designs for performing clinical research. The advantages of these study designs over other study designs are that they are relatively quick to perform, economical, and easy to design and implement. Case-control studies are particularly appropriate for studying disease outbreaks, rare diseases, or outcomes of interest. This article describes several types of case-control designs, with simple graphical displays to help understand their differences. St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, At-retinal and 13 cis-RA showed improved predictions for PTB, and At-retinal and 13 cis-RA along with retinol was potentially bound to RBP and migrated to the target tissue, suggesting the possibility of involvement in amniotic membrane rupture. By employing a nested, case-control study design to match a discovery cohort of PTB cases with TB controls, we were able to increase statistical efficiency by having all cases and controls derived from the same well-defined source population, and to address relative confounders [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, At-retinal and 13 cis-RA showed improved predictions for PTB, and At-retinal and 13 cis-RA along with retinol was potentially bound to RBP and migrated to the target tissue, suggesting the possibility of involvement in amniotic membrane rupture. By employing a nested, case-control study design to match a discovery cohort of PTB cases with TB controls, we were able to increase statistical efficiency by having all cases and controls derived from the same well-defined source population, and to address relative confounders [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other types include the case-cohort study and the case-crossover study which are discussed elsewhere. 9 In a nested case-control study, the case-control study is embedded within a cohort of patients, and cases and controls are both selected from the same cohort. This has the advantage of better controlling for potential confounders because controls are from the same general population as the cases.…”
Section: Structure Of Case-control Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can result in something called overmatching, which can bias towards a null effect and decrease the power of the study to find an association between disease and exposure. 9 Matching should be considered carefully because it can create selection bias, which may require further statistical adjustment. 18 Instead of, or in addition to matching, most case-control studies using multivariable logistic regression modeling during analysis to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics to create more similar baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Controlling For Confoundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case–control studies are an efficient research method for investigating the risk factors of a disease. In a case–control study, the selection of controls is more complicated than the selection of cases [ 10 ]. The problems regarding finding an optimal comparison control group are among the most challenging issues in the design of case–control studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection minimizes different types of bias while allowing greater generalizability of results and reliable effect size through a feasible recruitment approach. The appropriate choice of the control group and the excellent selection of cases on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria are crucial aspects to the design and execution of a logical case–control study [ 10 ]. Moreover, minimizing bias in control selection depends on suitable de-confounding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%