2018
DOI: 10.5334/irsp.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Primer To Power Analysis for Simple Experimental Designs

Abstract: When I finally stumbled onto power analysis, and managed to overcome the handicap of a background with no working math beyond high school algebra (to say nothing of mathematical statistics), it was as if I had died and gone to heaven."-Jacob Cohen Power analysis is one of the most fundamental tools that researchers can use when planning studies. It was pioneered in psychology more than fifty years ago by Jacob Cohen (1962, 1990). Since then, many have recommended its use and suggested it as good research pract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
241
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
241
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An a priori power analysis was conducted applying an R script by Perugini et al [56]. Based on our previous results, we estimated an effect size of 0.025.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An a priori power analysis was conducted applying an R script by Perugini et al [56]. Based on our previous results, we estimated an effect size of 0.025.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the more likely situation of no VHF asymmetry for one type of stimulus and a reliable VHF asymmetry for the other type of stimulus, the number of participants required must be multiplied by four (i.e., a total of at least 160 participants). The number further increases if the VHF asymmetry for one type of stimulus is just a bit smaller than that for the other type (Perugini et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements are still higher when the research involves the assessment of an interaction rather than a main effect. Only in case of a fully crossed interaction do the numbers of observations required for a main effect suffice (Brysbaert, 2019;Perugini, Gallucci, & Costantini, 2018). That is a situation in which one type of stimulus elicits a reliable RVF advantage and the other type of stimulus elicits an equally strong LVF advantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both processes are indicative of autonomic dysregulation, the former implicates a dominant PNS whereas the latter implicates a dominant SNS; thus, these two accounts not only yield distinct contributions to existing psychobiological models of SAD but also have distinct treatment implications. Finally, because we were limited in our statistical power to detect significant moderating effects of sex (Perugini, Gallucci, & Costantini, 2018), we stratified our analyses by sex given evidence of sex-specific effects in these processes (e.g., Brougham et al, 2009;Merikangas et al, 2010;Ordaz & Luna, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%