2018 31st SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/sibgrapi.2018.00066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Review on Medical Image Registration: From Rigid to Deep Learning Based Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the objects used are stored in a container called toolbox. However, contents can be added to the container using the register method [126].…”
Section: Proposed Optimisation Model Based On Multi Objective Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the objects used are stored in a container called toolbox. However, contents can be added to the container using the register method [126].…”
Section: Proposed Optimisation Model Based On Multi Objective Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this review is to provide a critical overview of existing literature on DL-based image registration, by highlighting innovations from a methodological and functional perspective, discussing current trends, challenges and limitations, and providing insights to the possible directions for future research. While there have been several review papers published recently on DL-based medical image registration [16][17][18][19], they primarily focus on the architecture of networks proposed for DL-based medical image registration, grouping and discussing them according to their design and learning paradigms (i.e. supervised, weakly-supervised or unsupervised, for example).…”
Section: Basic Deep Learning Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear registration (Ashburner, 2007;Avants et al, 2008;Rueckert et al, 1999;Vercauteren et al, 2009) estimates local deformations between pairs of images, and these algorithms tend to produce more accurate estimates when they can focus entirely on the anatomy of interest (Klein et al, 2009;Ou et al, 2014). Similarly, skull-stripping increases the reliability of linear registration (Cox and Jesmanowicz, 1999;Friston et al, 1995;Hoffmann et al, 2015;Jenkinson and Smith, 2001;Jiang et al, 1995;Modat et al, 2014;Reuter et al, 2010) by excluding anatomy that deforms non-rigidly, such as the eyes, jaw, and tongue (Andrade et al, 2018;Fein et al, 2006;Fischmeister et al, 2013;Hoffmann et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%