2018
DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giy032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical tool for maximal information coefficient analysis

Abstract: BackgroundThe ability of finding complex associations in large omics datasets, assessing their significance, and prioritizing them according to their strength can be of great help in the data exploration phase. Mutual information-based measures of association are particularly promising, in particular after the recent introduction of the TICe and MICe estimators, which combine computational efficiency with superior bias/variance properties. An open-source software implementation of these two measures providing … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold of 0.6 was utilized for the linear Pearson correlation analysis to identify the highly-correlated variables, which is in line with previous research (Kobelo et al 2008). Moreover, with respect to the nonlinear correlation, one of the mutual information based measures, maximal information coefficient (MIC) was also employed to identify the nonlinear association between two variables (Albanese et al 2018). As suggested by Albanese et al (2018), the threshold of MIC was chosen to be 0.7.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The threshold of 0.6 was utilized for the linear Pearson correlation analysis to identify the highly-correlated variables, which is in line with previous research (Kobelo et al 2008). Moreover, with respect to the nonlinear correlation, one of the mutual information based measures, maximal information coefficient (MIC) was also employed to identify the nonlinear association between two variables (Albanese et al 2018). As suggested by Albanese et al (2018), the threshold of MIC was chosen to be 0.7.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, with respect to the nonlinear correlation, one of the mutual information based measures, maximal information coefficient (MIC) was also employed to identify the nonlinear association between two variables (Albanese et al 2018). As suggested by Albanese et al (2018), the threshold of MIC was chosen to be 0.7. Above all, the highly correlated pairs of variables were selected based on two criteria: the Pearson correlation coefficient is greater than 0.6 or the MIC is greater than 0.7.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining available bacterial and fungal sequencing data from the same fecal samples, intradomain correlation analyses were performed using MICtools (119). All comparisons of relationships (i.e., bacterium-bacterium, fungus-fungus, fungus-bacterium within host species and forest) were assessed based on the relative abundance of bacterial and fungal SVs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, we would not be able to detect them using Spearman’s or Pearson’s correlation coefficients. We used instead MICtools package ( Albanese et al. 2018 ), which is able to identify a wider range of relationships in large data sets and assess their statistical significance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%