A Practical Workflow for an Open Scientific Lifecycle Project: EcoNAOS

Minelli, Annalisa; Sarretta, Alessandro; Oggioni, Alessandro; Bergami, Caterina; Pugnetti, Alessandra

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4_17

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• A research idea paper, reporting the outline of EcoNAOS project, on Research Ideas and Outcomes journal (RIO, Minelli et al, 2018b); • A report of our experience on the application of the Open Science principles to the NAS dataset (Minelli et al, 2018a); • A paper published in Communication in Computer Science (Minelli et al, 2019), presenting the EcoNAOS workflow and making a first assessment of the whole process; • A data paper on Earth System Science Data (Acri et al, 2020), describing the dataset published in Zenodo (Acri et al, 2019).…”

Section: Opening the Research Ideas And Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opening Marine Long-Term Ecological Science: Lesson Learned From the LTER-Italy Site Northern Adriatic Sea

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work presents a practical case study of the Open Science principles applied to the valorization of a long-term marine dataset collected in the Northern Adriatic Sea, one of the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites of the LTER-Italy network. The dataset covers a temporal range of 50 years (1965–2015), and it is composed of abiotic, and phyto- and zooplankton data, for a total of 21 parameters. The case study involved many actions, which will be described here, distinguishing between the ones affecting the whole research project workflow and those acting more specifically on the dataset. We evaluate strengths, weaknesses, and possible improvements for each action. The present study pointed out that, despite the initial and still some remaining mistrust, opening research projects is more than a best practice. It is (i) important because it improves research transparency (increasing researchers’ credibility, replicability of science, and products reuse), (ii) required by many international initiatives and regulations, and (iii) enriching because it encourages cooperation between scientists across different fields and laboratories.

show abstract

Section: Opening the Research Ideas And Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Opening Marine Long-Term Ecological Science: Lesson Learned From the LTER-Italy Site Northern Adriatic Sea

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mizzaro [28] introduced an open-source software solution for the implementation of crowdsourcing Peer Review methodologies. Minelli [24] showcased the practical application of the open scientific life-cycle model proposed by the EcoNAOS (Ecological North Adriatic Open Science Observatory System) project. Bardi [4] illustrated a framework for the description, and peer review of research flows developed in the OpenUp project.…”

Section: Open Science Publishing and Scientific Workflowsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Libraries

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries (IRCDL) is the annual Italian forum to discuss research topics on Digital Libraries and related technical, practical, and social issues. Along the years, IRCDL touched several aspects underlying the ?Digital Library" domain and promptly adapted to the evolution of the field. Today, the ?Digital Library" field includes theory and practices reflecting the evolution of the role of libraries in the scholarly communication domain, and also embracing scholarly communication and open science. The theme of IRCDL 2019 was ?Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science". Three main reasons motivated this theme: (i) science is increasingly becoming digital, meaning that research is performed using data services and digital tools; (ii) the results of the research are no longer just traditional scientific publications; (iii) the outcomes of science are increasingly encompassing datasets, software, and experiments. As digital artifacts, such products can be shared and re-used together with the article, thus enabling comprehensive research assessment and various degrees of reproducibility of science. Positive consequences of this shift towards Open Science are: accelerating science, optimizing the cost of research, fraud detection, and fullyfledged scientific reward. Digital Libraries are central in the evolution of research outputs by targeting findability, preservation, interlinking, and re-use of research products and by integrating the components of the scholarly communication process. The conference has been organized in Pisa, and the proceedings are published in the Springer CCIS series Vol. 988 [22]. Pre-print versions, research datasets, and research software relative to the accepted contributions are accessible via Zenodo.org.

show abstract

Section: Open Science Publishing and Scientific Workflowsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science

2019

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Practical Workflow for an Open Scientific Lifecycle Project: EcoNAOS

Cited by 3 publications

References 25 publications

Opening Marine Long-Term Ecological Science: Lesson Learned From the LTER-Italy Site Northern Adriatic Sea

Opening Marine Long-Term Ecological Science: Lesson Learned From the LTER-Italy Site Northern Adriatic Sea

Digital Libraries

Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About