A practitioner's view of the ‘Regenerative Paradigm’

Clegg, Peter

doi:10.1080/09613218.2012.663557

Cited by 21 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…O que o projeto regenerativo propõe àqueles que o utilizam e à sociedade em geral não é a contribuição para a preparação das consequências da degradação ecológica, mas a produção de alternativas de infraestruturas que permitam a reparação de danos já existentes. Geralmente, as práticas sustentáveis tendem a se referir ao planejamento de novas comunidades mais idealistas ao invés de lidar com a complexidade dos contextos urbanos existentes onde a maioria dos projetos reside (9). O desafio do século XXI é conciliar o desenvolvimento com a conservação e regeneração dos ecossistemas que suportam a vida no planeta.…”

Section: Projeto Regenerativounclassified

Diretrizes De Projeto Regenerativo: Uma Revisão Nos Limites Do Campus Universitário

Dias

Kós

2021

arquiteturarevis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A pesquisa observa as tendências de desenvolvimento dos modelos de universidade com o objetivo de apresentar uma proposta de planejamento fundamentada na perscpectiva do projeto regenerativo. Assim, buscou-se pensar sobre o declínio urbano, bem como quais políticas e iniciativas poderiam ser desenvolvidas para ajudar a remediar os problemas ambientais encontrados em campi e no seu entorno. A metodologia, aplicada no contexto urbano do Campus Sede da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), foi realizada em dois momentos. Primeiramente, com uma abordagem qualitativa e com a utilização das Guias de Projeto Regenerativo para Campus Universitário observou-se os problemas existentes no recorte do estudo. Assim, foi possível elaborar os potencias regenerativos. No segundo momento, os potenciais regenerativos obtidos foram organizados por similaridade de assunto em 10 Tópicos, configurando, dessa maneira, as diretrizes para o projeto regenerativo no Campus Trindade da UFSC. Após a aplicação da presente metodologia, concluiu-se que o conceito e a avaliação do projeto regenerativo permitem fornecer as bases a favor do alinhamento de um novo processo de desenvolvimento, o que concilia os esforços do desenvolvimento humano com a recuperação ambiental.Palavras-chave: Projeto regenerativo, campus universitário, integração, desenvolvimento sustentável.

show abstract

Section: Projeto Regenerativounclassified

Diretrizes De Projeto Regenerativo: Uma Revisão Nos Limites Do Campus Universitário

Dias

Kós

2021

arquiteturarevis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Less material use (embodied energy) Ball (2002), Bullen and Love (2010), Clegg (2012), Conejos et al (2011), Gaspar andSantos (2015), Itard and Klunder (2007), Lin and Low (2012) showing that the historic environment creates a price premium (Ahlfeldt et al, 2012;Been et al, 2016;Lazrak et al, 2013;Noonan and Krupka, 2011;Ruijgrok, 2006). Despite this range of studies, others describe the difficulty of quantifying heritage without the support of 'hard evidence' (Wilkinson et al, 2014).…”

Section: Advantages Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision-making for the demolition or adaptation of buildings

BakerHannah

Moncaster

Al-TabbaaAbir

2017

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Forensic En

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper considers why the decision may be made either to demolish or adapt existing buildings on brownfield sites and compares real-life decisions to those produced by theoretical design-support tools. Five case studies, including three individual buildings and two master plan sites of multiple buildings, were investigated through interviews with stakeholders. Reasons for retention included heritage value, architectural quality and government incentives, while reasons for demolition included maximising land value, lack of architectural significance and poor building condition. The analysis showed that the theoretical tools were useful for their intended purpose of analysing a portfolio of assets but that they could be improved by providing higher weightings for heritage values and extending the tools to assess different end uses and forms of adaptation. By testing the tools on master plan sites, the paper also identifies urban design variables, such as land efficiency, which would need to be incorporated for this purpose.

show abstract

“…However, in addition to well documented barriers faced by sustainability standards such as cost [7], lack of knowledge and experience [7][8][9] as well as time to gather the necessary information required for accreditation [9], regenerative standards are also criticized by a series of other reasons. These include: their lack of clarity in relation to what is considered a positive contribution [10] and how it can be assessed [11]; being questionable in terms of their efficiency [12]; having aims too ambitious to be adopted by designers without systemic thinking and ecological frameworks [13]; raising issues related to the scale of the proposed solution which normally is too small to provide clear ecological benefits [14] as well as feasibility in relation to how they can be inserted in the existing context of cities and neighborhoods [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing Regenerative Standards in Politically Green Nordic Social Welfare States: Can Sweden Adopt the Living Building Challenge?

Forsberg¹,

Souza

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on understanding the place for regenerative building standards within the context of politically green Nordic social welfare states. To this end, it examines the particular case of adopting the Living Building Challenge (LBC), an iconic example of regenerative design standard, in Sweden. An extensive document analysis comparing the Swedish building and planning regulations as well as the Miljöbyggnad national certification system with the LBC, shows overlaps and barriers the standard can face when adopted in the country. Barriers are validated and further discussed in interviews with one of the few architects trying to achieve a certified LBC building in Sweden and Swedish public authorities from the Boverket (Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning). Results from the document analysis and interviews show barriers to implement the LBC in Sweden are a product of a conscious political and ideological decision from the welfare state which considers infrastructure, and all its potential sustainable versions, a public good to be provided to all and funded by all. This premise contrasts with the self-sufficient approach promoted by the LBC, which in this particular aspect, can be interpreted as a threat to the welfare state.

show abstract

A practitioner's view of the ‘Regenerative Paradigm’

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Diretrizes De Projeto Regenerativo: Uma Revisão Nos Limites Do Campus Universitário

Diretrizes De Projeto Regenerativo: Uma Revisão Nos Limites Do Campus Universitário

Decision-making for the demolition or adaptation of buildings

Implementing Regenerative Standards in Politically Green Nordic Social Welfare States: Can Sweden Adopt the Living Building Challenge?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About