2006
DOI: 10.1039/b604498k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pragmatic and readily implemented quality control strategy for HPLC-MS and GC-MS-based metabonomic analysis

Abstract: Metabonomic/metabolomic studies can involve the analysis of large numbers of samples for the detection of biomarkers and confidence in the analytical data, generated by methods such as GC and HPLC-MS, requires active measures on the part of the analyst. However, quality control for complex multi-component samples such as biofluids, where many of the components of interest in the sample are unknown prior to analysis, poses significant problems. Here the repeat analysis of a pooled sample throughout the run, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
424
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 508 publications
(427 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
424
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The utilization of QC samples throughout the analytical run to monitor the data quality was a pragmatic solution for complex multi-component based metabomonic research. 14,15 As Fig. S1 in the ESI shows,w the QC samples clustered closely together in the PCA score plots, which means that the analytical systems were stable and reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The utilization of QC samples throughout the analytical run to monitor the data quality was a pragmatic solution for complex multi-component based metabomonic research. 14,15 As Fig. S1 in the ESI shows,w the QC samples clustered closely together in the PCA score plots, which means that the analytical systems were stable and reliable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To assure precision and repeatability of our sample analysis, we used pooled samples in both the discovery cohort (total 40 samples: 6 for precision and 14 for repeatability for each the positive and negative mode) and the validation cohort (total 52 samples: 6 for precision and 20 for repeatability for each the positive and negative mode) analyses for quality control (QC). [38][39][40] The pooled samples were prepared by mixing equal volumes of serum (100 μL) from 15 control and 15 autism samples in each analysis, respectively. We analyzed these QC samples together with study samples.…”
Section: Analytical Methods Validation and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total peak area of either ion mode in each chromatogram was set to 10,000. Ions with less than 30% relative standard deviation (RSD) in QC samples [16,17] were retained for further PCA modeling, as they were considered stable enough for prolonged LC-MS analysis,.…”
Section: Data Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%