2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pragmatic approach to the imaging and follow-up of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to sparse knowledge on the biological behavior of these tumors, guidelines for active surveillance are lacking and follow-up strategies vary amongst institutions. The Birmingham study group developed a pragmatic imaging tool for triaging cases for referral [11]. We agree that the current rise in incidence of these tumors warrants a pragmatic approach, as a large prospective long term follow-up study would take too long to accomplish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to sparse knowledge on the biological behavior of these tumors, guidelines for active surveillance are lacking and follow-up strategies vary amongst institutions. The Birmingham study group developed a pragmatic imaging tool for triaging cases for referral [11]. We agree that the current rise in incidence of these tumors warrants a pragmatic approach, as a large prospective long term follow-up study would take too long to accomplish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Due to these new insights, the most recent literature on cartilaginous tumors shifts towards active surveillance for ACTs in the long bones to avoid unnecessary surgeries [8][9][10][11]. Several authors have studied active surveillance for central cartilaginous tumors in the long bones without aggressive imaging characteristics (e.g., cortical destruction, soft tissue expansion) [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining border-line cases, sometimes referred to as quiescent, will require some form of imaging followup usually with MRI although how often and for how long is contentious. 4,6,43e46 It is for this reason that the authors of this study have adopted an in-house protocol for the follow-up of CCTs in the proximal humerus and around the knee which attempts to be risk averse without a commitment to a never-ending cycle of MRI 7,8,47 similar to subsequently published Danish guidelines. 48 However, the threshold for follow-up imaging and biopsy of central and proximal femoral CCTs as stressed above needs to be lower as the risk of malignancy at these sites is higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2e6 Recent publications have highlighted that, in the context of multidisciplinary deliberations, what was an occasional academic exercise, has now become an all too regular occurrence in specialist orthopaedic oncology units. 7,8 This has been attributed largely to the increasing routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 7,9 with CCTs identified in the proximal humerus in 2.1% 10 and around the knee in 2.8% 11,12 on routine MRI studies. The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify the change in referral incidence of central chondrosarcoma (CS) of bone treated in a single large specialist orthopaedic oncology centre over 33 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 13 14 15 16 Recent studies have highlighted the increased identification of CCTs attributed to the ever-increasing use of MRI particularly in the proximal humerus and around the knee. 17 18 Guidelines and imaging protocols for the management and follow-up have been proposed in an attempt to reduce costly and in many instances diagnostically low-yield follow-up imaging studies. 9 11 19 20 21 Whether the enchondromas retrospectively identified in this study merited any follow-up is debatable as the three cases (33%) that did undergo a repeat MRI scan showed no change including one after 5 years ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%